L Y GROUP DEVELOPMENT LTD v. EAST CANTON LTD AND ANOTHER
On the pleaded facts taken in the plaintiff's favour the deposits created an arguable equitable purchaser's lien over the Shares of Century Peace constituting an equitable charge; the holder of such a charge is entitled to preservation of its security and it is at least arguable that this jurisdiction can be exercised against third parties over whom the debtor has control where disposal would destroy the essence of the security; accordingly the interlocutory striking out applications against the 2nd Defendant failed and the plaintiff's amendment to join Century Peace was allowed, while the lis pendens registration against the Property was vacated as wrongful in law.
- Citation
- L Y GROUP DEVELOPMENT LTD v. EAST CANTON LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: L Y Group Development Limited; 1st Defendant: East Canton Limited; 2nd Defendant: Full Luck Hotel Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2015
- Case Number
- HCA1428/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (share and Property Sale) / Interlocutory Applications: Striking Out, Lis Pendens Vacation and Amendment of Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- 2nd Defendant's applications to cease being a party and to strike out dismissed; lis pendens registered by plaintiff vacated; plaintiff's amendment to add Century Peace allowed; costs orders made as nisi orders with details below.
- Legal Topics
- Purchaser's Lien, Lis Pendens, Strike Out, Piercing Corporate Veil, Injunctive Relief, Preservation of Security
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L Y Group Development Limited
Plaintiff
East Canton Limited
1st Defendant
Full Luck Hotel Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (share and Property Sale) / Interlocutory Applications: Striking Out, Lis Pendens Vacation and Amendment of Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has a purchaser's lien over the shares of Century Peace
- 2 Whether plaintiff may obtain injunctive relief affecting the 2nd defendant and Century Peace notwithstanding separate corporate personality in order to preserve its security
- 3 Whether the writ and statement of claim were registrable as a lis pendens against the Property
Ratio Decidendi
On the pleaded facts taken in the plaintiff's favour the deposits created an arguable equitable purchaser's lien over the Shares of Century Peace constituting an equitable charge; the holder of such a charge is entitled to preservation of its security and it is at least arguable that this jurisdiction can be exercised against third parties over whom the debtor has control where disposal would destroy the essence of the security; accordingly the interlocutory striking out applications against the 2nd Defendant failed and the plaintiff's amendment to join Century Peace was allowed, while the lis pendens registration against the Property was vacated as wrongful in law.
Court Disposition
2nd Defendant's applications to cease being a party and to strike out dismissed; lis pendens registered by plaintiff vacated; plaintiff's amendment to add Century Peace allowed; costs orders made as nisi orders with details below.
Orders
- 2nd Defendant's application under Order 15 r 6(2)(a) to cease to be a party dismissed
- 2nd Defendant's application under Order 18 r 19(1) to strike out the action as against the 2nd Defendant dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment