HKSAR v. LAI YIP KIE
The application for leave was dismissed because the evidence established premeditated, deliberate hiring of an arsonist and cold‑blooded conduct, negating any claim of loss of self‑control and meaning the trial judge correctly did not leave provocation to the jury.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAI YIP KIE
- Parties
- Applicant: Lai Yip Kie; Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 1998
- Case Number
- FAMC2/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal (criminal) — Miscellaneous Proceedings No. 2 of 1998 / Determination by Court of Final Appeal on Application for Leave to Appeal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Provocation Defence, Murder Conviction, Premeditation, Judicial Direction to Jury
- Source Language
- et
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lai Yip Kie
Applicant
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (criminal) — Miscellaneous Proceedings No. 2 of 1998 / Determination by Court of Final Appeal on Application for Leave to Appeal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge should have left provocation to the jury
- 2 Whether evidence supported a defence of provocation (loss of self-control)
- 3 Whether the applicant's acts were premeditated thereby negating provocation
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave was dismissed because the evidence established premeditated, deliberate hiring of an arsonist and cold‑blooded conduct, negating any claim of loss of self‑control and meaning the trial judge correctly did not leave provocation to the jury.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; no leave granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj HZ]9 FAMC No. 2 of 1998 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 2 OF 1998 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC 367 OF 1996) _______________________ Between: LAI YIP KIE Applicant - and - HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION Respondent ________________________ Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Litton PJ and Mr Justice Ching PJ Date of Hearing: May 1998 Date of Determination: May 1998 _________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _________________________ Mr Justice Litton PJ: This is the determination of the Appeal Committee on an application for leave to appeal brought under s32(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. The applicant was convicted of murder on 11 June 1996 after trial in the High Court. This arose out of a fire in a single-room unit in a domestic block in Lower Ngau Tau Kok Estate, Kowloon, which occurred in the early hours of 8 September 1995. The fire was deliberately started by the second defendant, at the instigation of the applicant, the first defendant. Two people, the occupants of the unit, were killed in the fire. On 29 January 1997 the applicant s application for leave to appeal against conviction was heard by the Court of Appeal. The main ground relied upon, and now repeated in support of the application before us, is that the judge should have left the issue of provocation to the jury. Provocation was not the defence run at the trial: it was total denial of any wrongdoing. The Court of Appeal refused leave. It said that the evidence at the trial, far from indicating loss of self-control, showed that the applicant s acts were premeditated: The applicant had hired the 2nd defendant to set fire to the unit and had acted in cold blood. The Court of Appeal therefore concluded that the trial judge was right not to leave provocation to the jury. There is no merit in this application. It is dismissed. (Andrew Li) Chief Justice (Henry Litton) Permanent Judge (Charles Ching) Permanent Judge Applicant, Lai Yip-kei, present in person Mr Christopher Grounds & Mr David Boyton, next friend of the Applicant Mr D.G. Saw, SC, SADPP & Ms C. Ko, GC of Department of Justice for Respondent/Director of Public Prosecutions - PAGE - @\\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Ne01: winspool HP LaserJet 4 Plus \\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Letter \\SERVER\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Letter FAMC No JUDICIARY Normal sslai Microsoft Word 8.0 DA_Zz JUDICIARY FAMC No Title _PID_GUID mw]9 Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8