HKSAR v. LAI YIP KIE

HKSAR v. LAI YIP KIE

The application for leave was dismissed because the evidence established premeditated, deliberate hiring of an arsonist and cold‑blooded conduct, negating any claim of loss of self‑control and meaning the trial judge correctly did not leave provocation to the jury.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HKSAR v. LAI YIP KIE
Parties
Applicant: Lai Yip Kie; Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Court
Court of Final Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
8 May 1998
Case Number
FAMC2/1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (criminal) — Miscellaneous Proceedings No. 2 of 1998 / Determination by Court of Final Appeal on Application for Leave to Appeal From Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Provocation Defence, Murder Conviction, Premeditation, Judicial Direction to Jury
Source Language
et
Criminal Law Appeal Homicide Arson Leave to Appeal Provocation Defence Murder Conviction Premeditation +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lai Yip Kie

Applicant

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal (criminal) — Miscellaneous Proceedings No. 2 of 1998 / Determination by Court of Final Appeal on Application for Leave to Appeal From Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge should have left provocation to the jury
  2. 2 Whether evidence supported a defence of provocation (loss of self-control)
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's acts were premeditated thereby negating provocation

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave was dismissed because the evidence established premeditated, deliberate hiring of an arsonist and cold‑blooded conduct, negating any claim of loss of self‑control and meaning the trial judge correctly did not leave provocation to the jury.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal dismissed; no leave granted