LAI YUEN WAH v. HOI KWONG PRINTING CO. LTD. AND OTHERS
Extension of time was granted because the short delay had a reasonable explanation, the merits favoured the defendants and the plaintiff suffered no significant prejudice; summary judgment was set aside because the statement of claim did not specify the amount, sought an inquiry and accounting, the Master produced an unexplained lump sum inconsistent with the pleaded case and failed to distinguish parties' liabilities across two properties, and trustee liability under s.32 was not pleaded as wilful default; amendment of the notice of appeal was allowed; costs reserved.
- Citation
- LAI YUEN WAH v. HOI KWONG PRINTING CO. LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LAI YUEN WAH; 1st Defendant: HOI KWONG PRINTING COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: CHAN YUET LING; 3rd Defendant: CHAN YUET LAI; 4th Defendant: CHAN YING CHOI DAVID
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2003
- Case Number
- HCA2179/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Master's Summary Judgment / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal and Amendment of Notice of Appeal; Appeal Allowed; Summary Judgment Set Aside
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; extension of time to appeal granted; leave to amend the notice of appeal granted; summary judgment set aside; costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Inquiry and Accounting, Trustee Liability, Pleadings, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAI YUEN WAH
Plaintiff
HOI KWONG PRINTING COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
CHAN YUET LING
2nd Defendant
CHAN YUET LAI
3rd Defendant
CHAN YING CHOI DAVID
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Master's Summary Judgment / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal and Amendment of Notice of Appeal; Appeal Allowed; Summary Judgment Set Aside
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted
- 2 Whether summary judgment was appropriate where statement of claim sought inquiry and accounting rather than specifying amount
- 3 Whether master erred in entering a lump sum against multiple defendants despite different allegations per property
Ratio Decidendi
Extension of time was granted because the short delay had a reasonable explanation, the merits favoured the defendants and the plaintiff suffered no significant prejudice; summary judgment was set aside because the statement of claim did not specify the amount, sought an inquiry and accounting, the Master produced an unexplained lump sum inconsistent with the pleaded case and failed to distinguish parties' liabilities across two properties, and trustee liability under s.32 was not pleaded as wilful default; amendment of the notice of appeal was allowed; costs reserved.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; extension of time to appeal granted; leave to amend the notice of appeal granted; summary judgment set aside; costs reserved
Orders
- Extend time to appeal against the summary judgment of 19 April 2002
- Grant leave to amend the notice of appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment