CHEUNG HONG MUI v. LAM MO SZE
The court held that the plaintiff, as the surviving spouse and holder of Letters of Administration, retains the prima facie right to possession and decision-making over the deceased's skeletal remains for burial/relocation; the defendant's prior role as licensee and her having made funeral arrangements do not displace that starting position in the absence of evidence that the plaintiff relinquished her rights; on balance of convenience and given urgency and the inadequacy of damages, the plaintiff showed a high degree of assurance of success and interlocutory prohibitive and mandatory relief should be granted in terms of paragraphs 1–3 of the summons dated 9 December 2010.
- Citation
- CHEUNG HONG MUI v. LAM MO SZE
- Parties
- Plaintiff (personal Representative of the Estate of Lam Kwan Hung, Deceased): CHEUNG HONG MUI; Defendant: LAM MO SZE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP2509/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Probate/estate Dispute (application for Prohibitive and Mandatory Injunctions) / Inter Partes Summons Heard in Chambers (interlocutory Hearing)
- Outcome
- Interlocutory relief granted in favour of plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Possession of a Corpse, Interment and Exhumation, Interlocutory Injunctions (including Mandatory Injunction), Rights of Personal Representative Vs Next of Kin, Administration of Estate
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHEUNG HONG MUI
Plaintiff (personal Representative of the Estate of Lam Kwan Hung, Deceased)
LAM MO SZE
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Probate/estate Dispute (application for Prohibitive and Mandatory Injunctions) / Inter Partes Summons Heard in Chambers (interlocutory Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is entitled to possession and control of the deceased's skeletal remains for burial/relocation
- 2 Whether the defendant's prior actions and status as CPC licensee displace the starting presumption favouring the surviving spouse/personal representative
- 3 Whether interlocutory prohibitive and mandatory injunctions should be granted (including need for high degree of assurance for mandatory injunction)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the plaintiff, as the surviving spouse and holder of Letters of Administration, retains the prima facie right to possession and decision-making over the deceased's skeletal remains for burial/relocation; the defendant's prior role as licensee and her having made funeral arrangements do not displace that starting position in the absence of evidence that the plaintiff relinquished her rights; on balance of convenience and given urgency and the inadequacy of damages, the plaintiff showed a high degree of assurance of success and interlocutory prohibitive and mandatory relief should be granted in terms of paragraphs 1–3 of the summons dated 9 December 2010.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory relief granted in favour of plaintiff
Orders
- Interlocutory prohibitory injunction restraining defendant from dealing with the skeletal remains and burial/relocation arrangements of Lam Kwan Hung (in terms of paragraph 1 of the Summons dated 9 December 2010)
- Interlocutory mandatory injunction authorizing the plaintiff to deal with the skeletal remains and burial/relocation arrangements of Lam Kwan Hung (in terms of paragraph 2 of the Summons dated 9 December 2010)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment