HKSAR v. LASTUTI

HKSAR v. LASTUTI

The magistrate's global starting point of 15 months (per Zhang Changyong) reduced to 10 months after guilty plea was within the appropriate range for the offences; the sentence was not manifestly excessive and the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Citation
HKSAR v. LASTUTI
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: Lastuti
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
2 July 2004
Case Number
HCMA446/2004
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal From Magistrate to Court of First Instance (appellate Jurisdiction)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
False Travel Document, False Representation to Immigration Officer, Furnishing False Particulars, Sentencing Guidelines
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

Lastuti

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal From Magistrate to Court of First Instance (appellate Jurisdiction)

  1. 1 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing range for using false travel documents and making false representations where misrepresentation was not trivial
  3. 3 Whether mitigating facts advanced by the appellant justified a greater reduction from the starting point

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate's global starting point of 15 months (per Zhang Changyong) reduced to 10 months after guilty plea was within the appropriate range for the offences; the sentence was not manifestly excessive and the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence upheld: Charges 1, 2 and 3 — 10 months' imprisonment; Charges 4 and 5 — 8 months' imprisonment; all terms to run concurrently
  • Appeal against sentence dismissed