LAU MUNG LAM v. ICHI STAR LTD formerly known as CARS\' MATE LTD AND ANOTHER
On the facts the cumulative presence of indicia (same premises, fixtures, customer files, partial staff re-employment, servicing of same customers and continuation of business) established a transfer of the business from the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant under the Ordinance; the plaintiff did not validly accept...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LAU MUNG LAM v. ICHI STAR LTD formerly known as CARS\' MATE LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lau Mung Lam; 1st Defendant: Ichi Star Limited formerly known as Cars' Mate Limited; 2nd Defendant: Wong Yuet Ling Jojo trading as Beauty Station
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2012
- Case Number
- DCCJ3238/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Breach of Contract and Liability Under Transfer of Business (protection of Creditors) Ordinance, Cap 49 / Trial on Liability and Assessment of Damages; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendants; 2nd defendant liable as transferee under the Transfer of Business (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance
- Legal Topics
- Repudiation of Contract, Transfer of Business, Assignment of Goodwill, Statutory Liability of Transferee, Acceptance/novation, Interest and Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lau Mung Lam
Plaintiff
Ichi Star Limited formerly known as Cars' Mate Limited
1st Defendant
Wong Yuet Ling Jojo trading as Beauty Station
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Breach of Contract and Liability Under Transfer of Business (protection of Creditors) Ordinance, Cap 49 / Trial on Liability and Assessment of Damages; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd defendant is liable as transferee under s3 of the Transfer of Business (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance
- 2 Whether the plaintiff accepted a substitute contract or arrangement with the 2nd defendant on 13 April 2009
- 3 Measure of damages for repudiation of contract by the 1st defendant
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts the cumulative presence of indicia (same premises, fixtures, customer files, partial staff re-employment, servicing of same customers and continuation of business) established a transfer of the business from the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant under the Ordinance; the plaintiff did not validly accept a substitute contract on 13 April 2009, therefore the 2nd defendant is liable as transferee under s3 and plaintiff is entitled to damages equal to the unused value of the prepaid packages (HK$278,969), interest and costs as ordered.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendants; 2nd defendant liable as transferee under the Transfer of Business (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance
Orders
- 1st defendant to pay damages to plaintiff in the sum of HK$278,969
- Judgment entered in favour of plaintiff against 2nd defendant for damages in the sum of HK$278,969
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment