TANG CHUNG WAH aka TANG CHUNG WAH, ALAN AND ANOTHER v. JONATHAN RUSSELL LEONG AND OTHERS
Registrar granted leave because the supplemental facts were relevant to pleaded issues, defendants failed to demonstrate real prejudice that could not be compensated or addressed (no fixed trial date exists), plaintiffs provided a satisfactory explanation for timing (pending strike-out application), and fairness required permitting the explanation of contested facts; defendants permitted to serve responsive supplemental statements and specific costs and timing orders imposed.
- Citation
- TANG CHUNG WAH aka TANG CHUNG WAH, ALAN AND ANOTHER v. JONATHAN RUSSELL LEONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: TANG CHUNG WAH aka TANG CHUNG WAH, ALAN; 2nd Plaintiff: LEE FUNG YING, ALISON; 1st Defendant: JONATHAN RUSSELL LEONG; 2nd Defendant: CHIU WING CHEUNG, RINGO; 3rd Defendant: LAM HUNG YUN, ANDREW; 4th Defendant: GARY TERRENCE JAMES; 5th Defendant: LO NGAI HANG aka LO NGAI HANG, TONY; 6th Defendant: AU YIU KWAN aka AU YIU KWAN, ALVIN; 7th Defendant: PATRICK ROZARIO; 8th Defendant: LI WING YIN aka LI WING YIN, AMOS; 9th Defendant: TSUI KA CHE, NORMAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2014
- Case Number
- HCA1691/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership Dispute and Fiduciary Duties Arising From Accounting Practice / Pre Trial Case Management; Application for Leave to Serve Supplemental Witness Statement and Leave to Set Down for Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted: leave given to plaintiffs to serve the 1st plaintiff's supplemental witness statement; plaintiffs given leave to set down for trial; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Adduce Supplemental Witness Statement, Case Management Discretion, Prejudice and Delay, Duplication and Relevance of Evidence, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TANG CHUNG WAH aka TANG CHUNG WAH, ALAN
1st Plaintiff
LEE FUNG YING, ALISON
2nd Plaintiff
JONATHAN RUSSELL LEONG
1st Defendant
CHIU WING CHEUNG, RINGO
2nd Defendant
LAM HUNG YUN, ANDREW
3rd Defendant
GARY TERRENCE JAMES
4th Defendant
LO NGAI HANG aka LO NGAI HANG, TONY
5th Defendant
AU YIU KWAN aka AU YIU KWAN, ALVIN
6th Defendant
PATRICK ROZARIO
7th Defendant
LI WING YIN aka LI WING YIN, AMOS
8th Defendant
TSUI KA CHE, NORMAN
9th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership Dispute and Fiduciary Duties Arising From Accounting Practice / Pre Trial Case Management; Application for Leave to Serve Supplemental Witness Statement and Leave to Set Down for Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant leave to serve a supplemental witness statement by the 1st plaintiff
- 2 Whether the supplemental witness statement is duplicative or irrelevant to pleaded issues
- 3 Whether the late service causes prejudice or affects the trial date
Ratio Decidendi
Registrar granted leave because the supplemental facts were relevant to pleaded issues, defendants failed to demonstrate real prejudice that could not be compensated or addressed (no fixed trial date exists), plaintiffs provided a satisfactory explanation for timing (pending strike-out application), and fairness required permitting the explanation of contested facts; defendants permitted to serve responsive supplemental statements and specific costs and timing orders imposed.
Court Disposition
Application granted: leave given to plaintiffs to serve the 1st plaintiff's supplemental witness statement; plaintiffs given leave to set down for trial; costs orders made.
Orders
- Leave to the plaintiffs to serve the 1st plaintiff's supplemental witness statement as per the draft annexed to the summons.
- Defendants have liberty to serve supplemental witness statements in response within 28 days from the date of the decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment