CHAN TUNG CHI v. SURYANI

CHAN TUNG CHI v. SURYANI

Leave to appeal refused because the adjudicator validly exercised the wide discretion under s19 to refuse a late application for a representative; the timing and lateness of the application and potential unfair advantage justified refusal and the delayed written reasons were permissible under s18; there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CHAN TUNG CHI v. SURYANI
Parties
Claimant (respondent): Chan Tung Chi; Defendant (appellant): Suryani
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
15 March 2012
Case Number
HCSA5/2012
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Right of Audience, Adjournment, Exercise of Discretion, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Small Claims Tribunal Practice Legal Representation Leave to Appeal Right of Audience Adjournment Exercise of Discretion +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chan Tung Chi

Claimant (respondent)

Suryani

Defendant (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Tribunal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against adjudicator's refusal to allow a representative at the review hearing
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator's written reasons given after the decision were valid
  3. 3 Whether the adjudicator properly exercised discretion under the Small Claims Tribunal Ordinance in refusing late representation

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal refused because the adjudicator validly exercised the wide discretion under s19 to refuse a late application for a representative; the timing and lateness of the application and potential unfair advantage justified refusal and the delayed written reasons were permissible under s18; there was no reasonable prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal refused