LEE TIN YEUNG v. CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL AND OTHERS
Damages for loss of earnings must be calculated on after-tax income by conducting two separate tax assessments—one on the hypothetical pre-injury income and one on the actual or notional post-injury income—applying tax allowances separately; the defendant receives credit for tax the plaintiff would have paid on pre-injury income while the plaintiff receives credit for tax applicable to his notional post-injury income.
- Citation
- LEE TIN YEUNG v. CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LEE TIN YEUNG; 1st Defendant: CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL; 2nd Defendant: CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION BUILDING (PROPERTY HOLDING) LIMITED; 3rd Defendant: LAU KI CHIT and CHOI CHEUNG KOK (on behalf of themselves and other members of THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL); 4th Defendant: The estate of LIU LIT FOR, deceased (supervisor of CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 February 2003
- Case Number
- HCPI201/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Ruling on Tax Liability (court of First Instance, Hearing 6 February 2003)
- Outcome
- Court recalculated after-tax losses and awarded specified pre-trial and future loss amounts.
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Earnings, Tax Liability in Damages, Notional Earnings, Assessment of Damages, Post Accident Income
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LEE TIN YEUNG
Plaintiff
CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL
1st Defendant
CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION BUILDING (PROPERTY HOLDING) LIMITED
2nd Defendant
LAU KI CHIT and CHOI CHEUNG KOK (on behalf of themselves and other members of THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL)
3rd Defendant
The estate of LIU LIT FOR, deceased (supervisor of CHIU CHOW ASSOCIATION SECONDARY SCHOOL)
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Ruling on Tax Liability (court of First Instance, Hearing 6 February 2003)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether damages for loss of earnings should be calculated on pre-tax or after-tax income
- 2 Whether the defendant should receive credit for tax the plaintiff would have paid on pre-injury income
- 3 How to treat tax on notional post-injury income when assessing compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Damages for loss of earnings must be calculated on after-tax income by conducting two separate tax assessments—one on the hypothetical pre-injury income and one on the actual or notional post-injury income—applying tax allowances separately; the defendant receives credit for tax the plaintiff would have paid on pre-injury income while the plaintiff receives credit for tax applicable to his notional post-injury income.
Court Disposition
Court recalculated after-tax losses and awarded specified pre-trial and future loss amounts.
Orders
- Pre-trial loss of earnings assessed at $1,019,705.44.
- Future loss of earnings assessed at $394,578.30.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment