LEETH & CO LTD v. MACK & CO (FREIGHT FORWARDERS) LTD AND OTHERS
The court found the 1st defendant liable: the welding operations were negligent and constituted a non-natural and extra-hazardous use of land so that both negligence and strict liability (Rylands/ common law for escape of fire) applied; the welders (2nd defendant) were negligent and must indemnify the 1st defendant; warnings alone did not discharge the duty to take proper precautions; the 3rd defendant was not liable for storage of wax/paints on the evidence.
- Citation
- LEETH & CO LTD v. MACK & CO (FREIGHT FORWARDERS) LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LEETH & CO. LIMITED; Plaintiff: KAI TAT HONG; Plaintiff: MAK LOUIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED; 1st Defendant: MACK & CO. (FREIGHT FORWARDERS) LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: NG SUM KEE WELDING WORKS; 3rd Defendant: WING KEE TRANSPORTATION CO. LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 July 1978
- Case Number
- HCA1636/1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort (consolidated Actions) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant; 2nd defendant found negligent and ordered to indemnify 1st defendant; claims against 3rd defendant dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Fire Damage, Welding Operations, Duty of Care, Rylands V. Fletcher (escape of Dangerous Things), Independent Contractor Liability, Warnings and Mitigation, Third Party Notices
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LEETH & CO. LIMITED
Plaintiff
KAI TAT HONG
Plaintiff
MAK LOUIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Plaintiff
MACK & CO. (FREIGHT FORWARDERS) LIMITED
1st Defendant
NG SUM KEE WELDING WORKS
2nd Defendant
WING KEE TRANSPORTATION CO. LIMITED
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort (consolidated Actions) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 1st defendant liable to plaintiffs for spread of fire at common law (strict liability)
- 2 Whether 1st defendant liable under Rylands v. Fletcher for non-natural user and escape of fire
- 3 Whether 1st defendant negligent in conduct and supervision of welding operations
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the 1st defendant liable: the welding operations were negligent and constituted a non-natural and extra-hazardous use of land so that both negligence and strict liability (Rylands/ common law for escape of fire) applied; the welders (2nd defendant) were negligent and must indemnify the 1st defendant; warnings alone did not discharge the duty to take proper precautions; the 3rd defendant was not liable for storage of wax/paints on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant; 2nd defendant found negligent and ordered to indemnify 1st defendant; claims against 3rd defendant dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the plaintiffs against the 1st defendant with costs
- 2nd defendant (Ng Sum Kee Welding Works) ordered to indemnify the 1st defendant as claimed in Third Party Notices
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment