VITALY ORLOV v. MAGNUS LEONARD ROTH AND ANOTHER

VITALY ORLOV v. MAGNUS LEONARD ROTH AND ANOTHER

Where shareholders establish a mutual understanding generating legitimate expectations as to profit sharing, information and participation, breach of those expectations can constitute unfair prejudice under section 724, permitting the court to order an appropriate remedy such as a buy-out.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 876
Parties
Subject Company: Three Towns Capital Limited; Applicants: Unnamed shareholders
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 March 2019
Case Number
HCMP1331/2017
Procedural Posture
HCMP 1331/2017 and HCMP 2753/2017 Companies Ordinance Proceedings (s.724) / Judgment
Outcome
Undisclosed in provided text
Legal Topics
Legitimate Expectation, Unfair Prejudice, Buy Out Remedy, Section 724 Companies Ordinance
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Three Towns Capital Limited

Subject Company

Unnamed shareholders

Applicants

Procedural Posture

HCMP 1331/2017 and HCMP 2753/2017 Companies Ordinance Proceedings (s.724) / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether shareholders had a mutual understanding or legitimate expectation to share profits 50:50
  2. 2 Whether there was a right to participate in management and to receive material information
  3. 3 Whether conduct complained of amounted to unfairly prejudicial or oppressive conduct under section 724

Ratio Decidendi

Where shareholders establish a mutual understanding generating legitimate expectations as to profit sharing, information and participation, breach of those expectations can constitute unfair prejudice under section 724, permitting the court to order an appropriate remedy such as a buy-out.

Court Disposition

Undisclosed in provided text