LEUNG CHING WAI v. LI YUN LIM The Sole Executor of the Estate of Ng Bo Chuen, Deceased AND ANOTHER
The court found on the facts that plaintiff made substantial monetary contributions (renovation set-off and mortgage repayments) giving rise to a purchase money resulting trust for 28.608% beneficial interest despite legal title being in the deceased grandmother and later vested in defendant; the express/common intention CICT, although established on the facts, was rejected as ex facie contrary to public policy and refused applying the Patel/Monat range of factors because the resulting trust provided an adequate, proportionate remedy and denial of CICT better serves public policy. The resulting trust was not barred by illegality.
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 459
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leung Ching Wai; 1st Defendant the Sole Executor of the Estate of Ng Bo Chuen, Deceased: Li Yun Lim; 2nd Defendant: Li Yun Lim
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2023
- Case Number
- DCCJ4851/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Property/trust Dispute / Judgment (district Court)
- Outcome
- Declaration granted that deceased grandmother (and since assent the defendant) held 28.608% beneficial interest on a purchase money resulting trust in favour of the plaintiff; common intention constructive trust claim dismissed; no order made on unjust enrichment claim at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Purchase Money Resulting Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Illegality/ex Turpi Causa, Housing Allocation/government Subsidy Abuse, Application of Patel V Mirza/monat Range of Factors
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Ching Wai
Plaintiff
Li Yun Lim
1st Defendant the Sole Executor of the Estate of Ng Bo Chuen, Deceased
Li Yun Lim
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Property/trust Dispute / Judgment (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should consider illegality although illegality was not pleaded by defendants
- 2 Whether the common intention constructive trust (CICT) is barred by illegality/public policy
- 3 Application of the Patel v Mirza/Monat range of factors to a CICT claim arising from misuse of a Green Form housing nomination
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the facts that plaintiff made substantial monetary contributions (renovation set-off and mortgage repayments) giving rise to a purchase money resulting trust for 28.608% beneficial interest despite legal title being in the deceased grandmother and later vested in defendant; the express/common intention CICT, although established on the facts, was rejected as ex facie contrary to public policy and refused applying the Patel/Monat range of factors because the resulting trust provided an adequate, proportionate remedy and denial of CICT better serves public policy. The resulting trust was not barred by illegality.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted that deceased grandmother (and since assent the defendant) held 28.608% beneficial interest on a purchase money resulting trust in favour of the plaintiff; common intention constructive trust claim dismissed; no order made on unjust enrichment claim at this stage.
Orders
- Declaration that the deceased grandmother and, since 2 May 2019, the 2nd defendant hold 28.608% of the beneficial interest in the Flat on a purchase money resulting trust in favour of the Plaintiff
- The Plaintiff's claim in common intention constructive trust is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment