HKSAR v. LEUNG KA CHING
Conviction under s.99 was quashed because the magistrate failed to state particulars and did not afford the appellant an opportunity to explain or be heard before summary conviction, thereby vitiating the conviction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LEUNG KA CHING
- Parties
- Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: LEUNG KA CHING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 1997
- Case Number
- HCMA279/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; fine to be refunded.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Conviction, Right to Be Heard, Insulting Behaviour Under Statute, Particulars of Charge
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HKSAR
Respondent
LEUNG KA CHING
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary conviction under s.99 Magistrates Ordinance required the magistrate to give particulars and afford opportunity to be heard before convicting
- 2 Whether chewing gum constituted insulting behaviour in the magistrate's presence
- 3 Whether failure to give particulars and opportunity vitiates a s.99 conviction
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under s.99 was quashed because the magistrate failed to state particulars and did not afford the appellant an opportunity to explain or be heard before summary conviction, thereby vitiating the conviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; fine to be refunded.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Conviction quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment