LEUNG WAI LING ISEWESG v. SUCCESS BASE ENGINEERING LTD
There was no factual basis to imply a fundamental landlord obligation to effect structural repairs; the tenancy was subject to the Deed of Mutual Covenant so the IO's safety‑based load restriction did not amount to an arguable derogation from grant or breach of quiet enjoyment; the defendant breached its covenant to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 163
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leung Wai Ling; Defendant: Success Base Engineering Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 January 2020
- Case Number
- HCA2/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment Application / Appeal From Master's Decision; Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Derogation From Grant, Implied Terms, Quiet Enjoyment, Repudiatory Breach, Forfeiture of Deposit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Wai Ling
Plaintiff
Success Base Engineering Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment Application / Appeal From Master's Decision; Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an implied covenant to effect structural repairs should be read into the tenancy agreement
- 2 Whether the IO's load‑restriction notice amounted to a derogation from grant or breach of quiet enjoyment
- 3 Whether there were triable issues sufficient to resist summary judgment
Ratio Decidendi
There was no factual basis to imply a fundamental landlord obligation to effect structural repairs; the tenancy was subject to the Deed of Mutual Covenant so the IO's safety‑based load restriction did not amount to an arguable derogation from grant or breach of quiet enjoyment; the defendant breached its covenant to pay rent and by returning the keys committed a repudiatory breach entitling the plaintiff to forfeit the tenancy and the deposit; accordingly no triable issue existed and summary judgment was entered for the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for the plaintiff
Orders
- Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff
- Defendant to pay arrears of rent for the period claimed (three months to end of 2018)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment