LI WEI v. BRIGHTEC LTD. AND OTHERS

LI WEI v. BRIGHTEC LTD. AND OTHERS

The article was found plainly libellous; the plaintiff proved serious reputational and business harm; the defendants did not appear or retract or apologise, which aggravated the injury; applying authorities on the purpose of libel damages and aggravation the court awarded a single sum of $150,000 as adequate compensation and exemplary damages to vindicate the plaintiff and compensate loss and injured feelings.

Citation
LI WEI v. BRIGHTEC LTD. AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Li Wei; 1st Defendant: Brightec Limited; 2nd Defendant: Lau Tat Man; 3rd Defendant: Ha Fai Yi International Publication Company (a firm)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
12 January 2001
Case Number
HCA4430/2000
Procedural Posture
Defamation (libel) / Assessment of Damages (interlocutory Judgment Entered)
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff; damages awarded against all three defendants.
Legal Topics
Libel, Compensatory Damages, Exemplary Damages, Aggravation, Retraction and Apology
Source Language
EN
Defamation Civil Damages Media Law Libel Compensatory Damages Exemplary Damages Aggravation Retraction and Apology

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Li Wei

Plaintiff

Brightec Limited

1st Defendant

Lau Tat Man

2nd Defendant

Ha Fai Yi International Publication Company (a firm)

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation (libel) / Assessment of Damages (interlocutory Judgment Entered)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the published article was libellous
  2. 2 Quantification of compensatory damages for injury to reputation and business loss
  3. 3 Availability and quantum of exemplary (punitive) damages

Ratio Decidendi

The article was found plainly libellous; the plaintiff proved serious reputational and business harm; the defendants did not appear or retract or apologise, which aggravated the injury; applying authorities on the purpose of libel damages and aggravation the court awarded a single sum of $150,000 as adequate compensation and exemplary damages to vindicate the plaintiff and compensate loss and injured feelings.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff; damages awarded against all three defendants.

Orders

  • Judgment in the sum of $150,000 against the three defendants
  • Plaintiff to have costs of this assessment with certificate for counsel