LEE CHIU LAN v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
On the uncontradicted documentary and witness evidence the court found R1 was the employer of the eight deceased and R2 was the principal contractor; the deaths occurred in the course of employment and therefore arose out of employment by operation of s.5(4)(a); compensation was assessed under s.6 and s.11 with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LEE CHIU LAN v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant: Li Yuen Yau; Applicant: Lee Chiu Lan; Applicant: Ignatova Lyudmila Mikhalovna; Applicant: Mikhaylishina Olesya Igorevna; Applicant: Sherstyuk Irina Sergeevna; Applicant: Stepanova Valentina Konstantinovna; Applicant: Pozdnyak Olga Lvovna; Applicant: Trofimov Oksana Vladimirovna; 1st Respondent: Viatech Engineering Limited; 2nd Respondent: Zen Pacific Civil Contractors Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2007
- Case Number
- DCEC154/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation / Assessment of Compensation; Judgment on Liability and Quantum (judgment Delivered 20 March 2007)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Applicants; 1st Respondent (Viatech) liable as employer; 2nd Respondent (Zen Pacific) liable as principal contractor; compensation assessed
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Death, Employer Liability, Principal Contractor Liability, Statutory Compensation, Apportionment of Compensation, Indemnity Claim
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Li Yuen Yau
Applicant
Lee Chiu Lan
Applicant
Ignatova Lyudmila Mikhalovna
Applicant
Mikhaylishina Olesya Igorevna
Applicant
Sherstyuk Irina Sergeevna
Applicant
Stepanova Valentina Konstantinovna
Applicant
Pozdnyak Olga Lvovna
Applicant
Trofimov Oksana Vladimirovna
Applicant
Viatech Engineering Limited
1st Respondent
Zen Pacific Civil Contractors Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation / Assessment of Compensation; Judgment on Liability and Quantum (judgment Delivered 20 March 2007)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Respondent was the employer of the eight deceased
- 2 Whether the 2nd Respondent was the principal contractor liable under s.24 of Cap.282
- 3 Whether the deaths arose out of and in the course of employment (s.5(4)(a))
Ratio Decidendi
On the uncontradicted documentary and witness evidence the court found R1 was the employer of the eight deceased and R2 was the principal contractor; the deaths occurred in the course of employment and therefore arose out of employment by operation of s.5(4)(a); compensation was assessed under s.6 and s.11 with apportionment under Schedule 7 as set out in the judgment; interest and costs awarded; indemnity claim by R2 against R1 to be heard subsequently under s.24(2).
Court Disposition
Judgment for Applicants; 1st Respondent (Viatech) liable as employer; 2nd Respondent (Zen Pacific) liable as principal contractor; compensation assessed
Orders
- DCEC 153/2004 (Tso Pak-kuen): Award HK$504,000; statutory funeral expenses HK$35,000; interest at half judgment rate from date of accident until date of award and judgment rate thereafter until payment; apportionment and costs as per Schedule 7 and order
- DCEC 154/2004 (Chan Shing-tong): Award HK$756,000; statutory funeral expenses HK$35,000; interest at half judgment rate from date of accident until date of award and judgment rate thereafter until payment; apportionment and costs as per Schedule 7 and order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment