張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份相關員工 AND OTHERS v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
The applications for declarations of an equitable lien and related relief were dismissed because the Former Receivers failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that any actual or potential indebtedness existed to support the equitable lien: the alleged funding/loans (HK$28m) lacked contemporaneous documentation and essential terms, the evidence was inadequate and speculative, and the discretionary nature of the relief meant it should be refused on the evidence.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1805
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: 1st Group of Relevant employees whose shares in CHINA SHANSHUI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED were held by ZHANG CAIKUI on trust; Plaintiffs: 2nd Group of Relevant employees whose shares in CHINA SHANSHUI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED were held by LI YANMIN on trust; Plaintiffs / Respondents: SH Plaintiffs (Employee Shareholders); Applicants: EY Receivers (Former Receivers); 1st Defendant: ZHANG CAIKUI; 2nd Defendant: LI YANMIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2021
- Case Number
- HCA1661/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Actions (lien Summonses) / Decision Following Hearing on Lien Summonses
- Outcome
- Lien Summonses dismissed and ancillary order refused; costs nisi in favour of SH Plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Lien, Indemnity, Waiver, Abuse of Process, Declaration, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
1st Group of Relevant employees whose shares in CHINA SHANSHUI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED were held by ZHANG CAIKUI on trust
Plaintiffs
2nd Group of Relevant employees whose shares in CHINA SHANSHUI INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED were held by LI YANMIN on trust
Plaintiffs
SH Plaintiffs (Employee Shareholders)
Plaintiffs / Respondents
EY Receivers (Former Receivers)
Applicants
ZHANG CAIKUI
1st Defendant
LI YANMIN
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trust Actions (lien Summonses) / Decision Following Hearing on Lien Summonses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether court-appointed receivers are entitled to an equitable lien over the Receiver Shares
- 2 Standard of proof required to establish an actual or potential indebtedness to support a lien
- 3 Whether the Former Receivers waived their lien by prior conduct or releases
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for declarations of an equitable lien and related relief were dismissed because the Former Receivers failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that any actual or potential indebtedness existed to support the equitable lien: the alleged funding/loans (HK$28m) lacked contemporaneous documentation and essential terms, the evidence was inadequate and speculative, and the discretionary nature of the relief meant it should be refused on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Lien Summonses dismissed and ancillary order refused; costs nisi in favour of SH Plaintiffs
Orders
- Lien Summonses dismissed
- Order for ancillary relief that shares remain deposited with Court refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment