RE GREATER BEIJING FIRST EXPRESSWAYS LTD
The court held that the liquidators' outright refusal to sell assignable causes of action was a decision a reasonable liquidator could not make where a purchaser offered consideration and appropriate safeguards; accordingly the liquidators were directed to assign the assignable causes of action to GBRE unless a higher offer was received within 14 days, conditional on GBRE paying US$250,000 into court as security for liquidators' costs and on a BVI court order declaring the dissolution void.
- Citation
- RE GREATER BEIJING FIRST EXPRESSWAYS LTD
- Parties
- Applicant (assignment Summons), Sole Shareholder and Subordinated Creditor: Greater Beijing Region Expressways Ltd (GBRE); Company in Liquidation: Greater Beijing First Expressways Limited (GBFE) (In Liquidation); Respondent (liquidators): Joint & Several Liquidators of GBFE; Indenture Trustee / Interested Creditor: JP Morgan Chase Bank (indenture trustee for the Noteholders)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW338/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) No. 338 of 2000 / Interlocutory Hearing on Assignment and Release Summonses (decision on Summonses)
- Outcome
- Assignment Summons granted in part; Release Summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Powers and Review Under Section 200(5), Assignment of Causes of Action, Security for Costs, Duty to Obtain Best Price/marketing of Assets, Effect of Foreign Dissolution
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greater Beijing Region Expressways Ltd (GBRE)
Applicant (assignment Summons), Sole Shareholder and Subordinated Creditor
Greater Beijing First Expressways Limited (GBFE) (In Liquidation)
Company in Liquidation
Joint & Several Liquidators of GBFE
Respondent (liquidators)
JP Morgan Chase Bank (indenture trustee for the Noteholders)
Indenture Trustee / Interested Creditor
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) No. 338 of 2000 / Interlocutory Hearing on Assignment and Release Summonses (decision on Summonses)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether GBRE had locus to apply under ss.199(3) and 200(5)
- 2 Whether the liquidators' refusal to assign causes of action was one no reasonable liquidator could have made
- 3 Which causes of action are assignable given prior sale agreements
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the liquidators' outright refusal to sell assignable causes of action was a decision a reasonable liquidator could not make where a purchaser offered consideration and appropriate safeguards; accordingly the liquidators were directed to assign the assignable causes of action to GBRE unless a higher offer was received within 14 days, conditional on GBRE paying US$250,000 into court as security for liquidators' costs and on a BVI court order declaring the dissolution void.
Court Disposition
Assignment Summons granted in part; Release Summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
Orders
- Unless a higher offer is received within 14 days and upon GBRE paying into court US$250,000.00 within 7 days as security for the liquidators' costs, the liquidators are directed to assign to GBRE the various assignable causes of action in the revised schedule on the principal terms in the Letter dated 22 November 2005
- The liquidators' obligation to assign is conditional on an order of the BVI court declaring the dissolution of GBFE to be void
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment