RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD
Sections 196(2) and rule 146(2) confer on the court an unfettered discretion and do not require the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver to be the default; as a matter of established and appropriate practice the court will adopt the time cost basis for remuneration of liquidators in summary cases...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD
- Parties
- Official Receiver (statutory Liquidator): Official Receiver; Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator: Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited; Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator: Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited; Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator: Kenny Tam & Co.; Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator: Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.; Company: GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LIMITED; Company: DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED; Company: SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED; Company: REGENT DELTA LIMITED; Company: SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED; Company: HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED; Company: PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; Company: CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED; Company: LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED; Company: HEADWELL LIMITED; Company: KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED; Company: MAJORWORLD LIMITED; Company: ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED; Company: CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW557/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Hearing for Determination of Basis of Liquidators' Remuneration (interlocutory Determination)
- Outcome
- Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for remuneration of liquidators in summary cases; court confirms discretion under s196(2) and rejects percentage basis as default
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Remuneration, Summary Winding Up, Companies Ordinance S227 F, Companies Ordinance S196(2), Companies (winding Up) Rules R146(2), Panel T Scheme
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Receiver
Official Receiver (statutory Liquidator)
Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited
Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator
Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited
Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator
Kenny Tam & Co.
Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator
Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.
Panel T Practitioner / Liquidator
GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LIMITED
Company
DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED
Company
SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED
Company
REGENT DELTA LIMITED
Company
SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED
Company
FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED
Company
APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED
Company
CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED
Company
HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED
Company
PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Company
CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED
Company
CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED
Company
LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED
Company
HEADWELL LIMITED
Company
KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED
Company
MAJORWORLD LIMITED
Company
ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED
Company
CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Company
Procedural Posture
Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Hearing for Determination of Basis of Liquidators' Remuneration (interlocutory Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether remuneration of liquidators appointed under s227F should be assessed on percentage basis or time cost basis
- 2 Whether rule 146(2) imposes percentage basis as default absent court order
- 3 Whether special circumstances must be shown to depart from percentage basis
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 196(2) and rule 146(2) confer on the court an unfettered discretion and do not require the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver to be the default; as a matter of established and appropriate practice the court will adopt the time cost basis for remuneration of liquidators in summary cases under s227F and such basis should be provided for when the summary procedure order is made.
Court Disposition
Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for remuneration of liquidators in summary cases; court confirms discretion under s196(2) and rejects percentage basis as default
Orders
- Time cost basis to be adopted as the basis of remuneration for liquidators in summary cases under s227F and to be provided for upon the making of the summary procedure order
- The percentage basis pursuant to the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order is not the default basis where the court exercises its discretion under s196(2)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment