SHINEWING SPECIALIST ADVISORY SERVICES LTD v. CHEN YUNG NGAI KENNETH (AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF DE RODEO CATERING LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) )
The Claimant's Notice of Appeal was dismissed because there was no sealed or written appealable order: the 21 August 2015 order had not been sealed and the clarification summonses were dismissed; oral remarks by the Master are not appealable. A sealed order or a written determination following taxation is required before an appeal can be entertained.
- Citation
- SHINEWING SPECIALIST ADVISORY SERVICES LTD v. CHEN YUNG NGAI KENNETH (AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF DE RODEO CATERING LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) )
- Parties
- Claimant: Shinewing Specialist Advisory Services Limited; 1st Respondent (liquidator): Chen Yung Ngai Kenneth; 2nd Respondent: Yung Shiu Ching; 3rd Respondent: Lee Bing Fai; 4th Respondent: Chan Kwok Keung; 5th Respondent: Au Lai Chi; 6th Respondent: Lam Charm; 7th Respondent: Wong Sek Tung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 January 2016
- Case Number
- HCCW346/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Miscellaneous Proceedings / Interlocutory Appeal Against Master's Taxation Related Decision
- Outcome
- Claimant's Notice of Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator's Costs, Taxation of Costs, Appealability of Interlocutory Decisions, Sealing of Orders, Clarification of Costs Orders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shinewing Specialist Advisory Services Limited
Claimant
Chen Yung Ngai Kenneth
1st Respondent (liquidator)
Yung Shiu Ching
2nd Respondent
Lee Bing Fai
3rd Respondent
Chan Kwok Keung
4th Respondent
Au Lai Chi
5th Respondent
Lam Charm
6th Respondent
Wong Sek Tung
7th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Miscellaneous Proceedings / Interlocutory Appeal Against Master's Taxation Related Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is an appealable determination from the Master that the Claimant may appeal
- 2 Whether the 21 August 2015 order (unsealed) and the Master's oral remarks constitute an appealable order
- 3 Whether the Claimant must bear 20% of the liquidator's costs inclusive of the liquidator's own fees and expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant's Notice of Appeal was dismissed because there was no sealed or written appealable order: the 21 August 2015 order had not been sealed and the clarification summonses were dismissed; oral remarks by the Master are not appealable. A sealed order or a written determination following taxation is required before an appeal can be entertained.
Court Disposition
Claimant's Notice of Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's Notice of Appeal dismissed
- Costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment