LISAJIDIN v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

LISAJIDIN v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The application for leave was refused and extension of time denied because the application was filed out of time without adequate explanation and the proposed grounds lacked a realistic prospect of success given the Board's factual findings (contradictory evidence, lack of substantiation of the alleged loan and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] HKCFI 77
Parties
Applicant: Lisajidin; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
7 January 2026
Case Number
HCAL1218/2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review — Application for Leave / Decision on Extension of Time and Leave Application (extension Refused; Leave Dismissed)
Outcome
Extension of time refused; application for leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Torture and CIDTP, Internal Relocation, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Delay / Extension of Time, Standard of Review for Administrative Decisions
Source Language
en
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Law Non Refoulement Torture and CIDTP Internal Relocation Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Delay / Extension of Time +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lisajidin

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review — Application for Leave / Decision on Extension of Time and Leave Application (extension Refused; Leave Dismissed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to extend time for making the leave application
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has a realistic prospect of success on judicial review
  3. 3 Whether the Board committed errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in its findings

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave was refused and extension of time denied because the application was filed out of time without adequate explanation and the proposed grounds lacked a realistic prospect of success given the Board's factual findings (contradictory evidence, lack of substantiation of the alleged loan and threats, and viability of internal relocation), and no legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality was shown.

Court Disposition

Extension of time refused; application for leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Orders

  • Extension of time for the application for judicial review is refused.
  • Application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.