CHOI GAIN CHEE AND ANOTHER v. KOWLOON DEVELOPMENT CO LTD AND OTHERS
The pleaded case discloses no reasonable cause of action for beneficial or proprietary interest in the land because the plaintiffs only had shareholdings and contractual arrangements which cannot confer proprietary title; the action is an abuse of process insofar as the contractual claim duplicates HCA192 and therefore must be struck out; consequentially the registration of the writ as a lis pendens is vacated; costs awarded to defendants on party and party basis (nisi).
- Citation
- CHOI GAIN CHEE AND ANOTHER v. KOWLOON DEVELOPMENT CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHOI GAIN CHEE; 2nd Plaintiff: WORLD TOWER PROPERTIES LIMITED; 1st Defendant: KOWLOON DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD; 2nd Defendant: ROE INVESTMENT CO. LTD; 3rd Defendant: KING S CITY HOLDING LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2005
- Case Number
- HCA761/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (property, Trusts and Contract) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application; Judgment on Summons to Strike Out and Vacate Lis Pendens
- Outcome
- Action struck out in part: proprietary/beneficial interest claim dismissed for disclosing no reasonable cause; contractual claim struck out as abuse of process as duplicative of HCA192; writ registered as lis pendens vacated; costs to defendants on party and party basis (nisi).
- Legal Topics
- Lis Pendens, Beneficial Ownership, Proprietary Interest, Strike Out, Abuse of Process, Issue Estoppel, Specific Performance, Registration and Vacation of Writ, Resulting Trust, Agency
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOI GAIN CHEE
1st Plaintiff
WORLD TOWER PROPERTIES LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
KOWLOON DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD
1st Defendant
ROE INVESTMENT CO. LTD
2nd Defendant
KING S CITY HOLDING LTD
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (property, Trusts and Contract) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application; Judgment on Summons to Strike Out and Vacate Lis Pendens
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have a reasonable cause of action for beneficial or proprietary interest in land
- 2 Whether the second action is an abuse of process because the cause of action is pending in HCA192
- 3 Whether re‑raising the action to re‑register a lis pendens is an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The pleaded case discloses no reasonable cause of action for beneficial or proprietary interest in the land because the plaintiffs only had shareholdings and contractual arrangements which cannot confer proprietary title; the action is an abuse of process insofar as the contractual claim duplicates HCA192 and therefore must be struck out; consequentially the registration of the writ as a lis pendens is vacated; costs awarded to defendants on party and party basis (nisi).
Court Disposition
Action struck out in part: proprietary/beneficial interest claim dismissed for disclosing no reasonable cause; contractual claim struck out as abuse of process as duplicative of HCA192; writ registered as lis pendens vacated; costs to defendants on party and party basis (nisi).
Orders
- Strike out the plaintiffs' claim for beneficial or proprietary interest in the land
- Strike out the plaintiffs' contractual claim in this action as an abuse of process because the claim is duplicative of proceedings in HCA192
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment