KCMA v. ABC AND OTHERS
The Family Trust is a realistic source of litigation funds for both parties; the correct process is a joint request to the Trustee and distributions should be limited to funding through the FDR stage. On the material before the court the appropriate interim quantum is HKD 1,500,000 each to be paid by the Trustee direct to each party's solicitors to be applied to billed/unbilled costs and held on account; the 2nd Summons is adjourned sine die and will be dismissed upon such payments; costs of this application are reserved to the ancillary relief trial.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 848
- Parties
- Petitioner: KCMA; 1st Respondent: ABC; 2nd Respondent: PBB (Trustee of the Family Trust); 3rd Respondent: PBB (Trustee of the Education Trust); 4th Respondent: K
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2020
- Case Number
- HCMC1/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Proceedings (ancillary Relief, Litigation Funding Application) / Interim Paper Disposal of Summons for Litigation Funding; Direction Hearing and FDR to Be Fixed; Substantive AR Trial Fixed for May 2021
- Outcome
- W's 2nd Summons adjourned sine die and to be dismissed upon each party's solicitors receiving HKD 1,500,000 from the Trustee; direction hearing for FDR fixed; costs reserved to the ancillary relief trial.
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Funding, Maintenance Pending Suit, S17 MPPO (dispositions and Variation), Trust Distributions, Joinder, Disclosure, Mediation/fdr
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KCMA
Petitioner
ABC
1st Respondent
PBB (Trustee of the Family Trust)
2nd Respondent
PBB (Trustee of the Education Trust)
3rd Respondent
K
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Proceedings (ancillary Relief, Litigation Funding Application) / Interim Paper Disposal of Summons for Litigation Funding; Direction Hearing and FDR to Be Fixed; Substantive AR Trial Fixed for May 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Family Trust is a source of funds reasonably available to the applicant (W)
- 2 Whether the respondent (H) can afford to pay W's legal costs without a distribution from the Family Trust
- 3 Whether the litigation funding quantum claimed by W is reasonable and appropriately limited in time
Ratio Decidendi
The Family Trust is a realistic source of litigation funds for both parties; the correct process is a joint request to the Trustee and distributions should be limited to funding through the FDR stage. On the material before the court the appropriate interim quantum is HKD 1,500,000 each to be paid by the Trustee direct to each party's solicitors to be applied to billed/unbilled costs and held on account; the 2nd Summons is adjourned sine die and will be dismissed upon such payments; costs of this application are reserved to the ancillary relief trial.
Court Disposition
W's 2nd Summons adjourned sine die and to be dismissed upon each party's solicitors receiving HKD 1,500,000 from the Trustee; direction hearing for FDR fixed; costs reserved to the ancillary relief trial.
Orders
- Parties to undertake and jointly request the Trustee of the Family Trust within 14 days to distribute HKD 1,500,000 to each party
- Trustee to pay HKD 1,500,000 directly to each party's solicitors to be applied towards billed and unpaid costs and held on account for future costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment