CHINA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC (IN LIQUIDATION) AND OTHERS v. WU XIAODONG AND OTHERS
Communications and materials created by the liquidators and their agents with the six experts after the protective writ was issued were produced for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice and evidence for contemplated or pending litigation; therefore they are protected by litigation privilege. The affidavits filed in ex parte applications disclosed only conclusions or effects of those communications and did not deploy the contents so as to waive privilege. Accordingly the discovery/inspection summons is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1892
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (in Liquidation): China Medical Technologies, Inc; 2nd Plaintiff: CMED Technologies Ltd; 3rd Plaintiffs (joint and Several Liquidators of China Medical Technologies, Inc (in Liquidation)): Cosimo Borrelli and Yuen Lai Yee; 1st Defendant: Wu Xiaodong; 2nd Defendant: Samson Tsang Tak Yung; 3rd Defendant: Chen Zhong; 4th Defendant: Zhu Feng (Charles); 5th Defendant (in His Personal Capacity and Formerly Trading as Kam Hing Trading Co): Chong Wing Hip; 6th Defendant: Hao Xiaoqing Allan; 7th Defendant: Supreme Well Investments Limited; 8th Defendant: East Hope International Limited; 9th Defendant: Cheer Link International Limited; 10th Defendant: Innovative Technology Investment Limited; 11th Defendant: Dynamic Sense Limited; 12th Defendant: Time Region Holdings Limited; 13th Defendant (in Her Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Xiao Qiong Bi Trust and the Alisa Wu Irrevocable Trust): Bi Xiaoqiong; 14th Defendant: Worldpro Investments Limited; 15th Defendant: Long Chart Investments Limited; 16th Defendant: Chavis Investments Limited; 17th Defendant: Sinowell International Investment Limited; 18th Defendant: Chengxuan International Ltd; 19th Defendant: Weixiao Medical Technology Limited; 20th Defendant: WB International Holding Pte Ltd; 21st Defendant: Max Prosper Enterprises Limited; 22nd Defendant: Jun Yun Bi; 23rd Defendant: Global Flash Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2023
- Case Number
- HCA3391/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Insolvency/litigation Between Liquidators and Former Management (interlocutory Discovery Application) / Interlocutory (chambers Hearing on Summons Dated 24 September 2021 for Discovery and Inspection)
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Privilege, Waiver of Privilege (deployment), Discovery, Expert Evidence, Protective Writ, Mareva/injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China Medical Technologies, Inc
1st Plaintiff (in Liquidation)
CMED Technologies Ltd
2nd Plaintiff
Cosimo Borrelli and Yuen Lai Yee
3rd Plaintiffs (joint and Several Liquidators of China Medical Technologies, Inc (in Liquidation))
Wu Xiaodong
1st Defendant
Samson Tsang Tak Yung
2nd Defendant
Chen Zhong
3rd Defendant
Zhu Feng (Charles)
4th Defendant
Chong Wing Hip
5th Defendant (in His Personal Capacity and Formerly Trading as Kam Hing Trading Co)
Hao Xiaoqing Allan
6th Defendant
Supreme Well Investments Limited
7th Defendant
East Hope International Limited
8th Defendant
Cheer Link International Limited
9th Defendant
Innovative Technology Investment Limited
10th Defendant
Dynamic Sense Limited
11th Defendant
Time Region Holdings Limited
12th Defendant
Bi Xiaoqiong
13th Defendant (in Her Personal Capacity and as Trustee of the Xiao Qiong Bi Trust and the Alisa Wu Irrevocable Trust)
Worldpro Investments Limited
14th Defendant
Long Chart Investments Limited
15th Defendant
Chavis Investments Limited
16th Defendant
Sinowell International Investment Limited
17th Defendant
Chengxuan International Ltd
18th Defendant
Weixiao Medical Technology Limited
19th Defendant
WB International Holding Pte Ltd
20th Defendant
Max Prosper Enterprises Limited
21st Defendant
Jun Yun Bi
22nd Defendant
Global Flash Limited
23rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Insolvency/litigation Between Liquidators and Former Management (interlocutory Discovery Application) / Interlocutory (chambers Hearing on Summons Dated 24 September 2021 for Discovery and Inspection)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Subject Materials are protected by litigation privilege
- 2 Whether privilege was waived by deployment in ex parte applications
- 3 Whether the documents are necessary for disposing fairly of the cause or matter or for saving costs (necessity)
Ratio Decidendi
Communications and materials created by the liquidators and their agents with the six experts after the protective writ was issued were produced for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice and evidence for contemplated or pending litigation; therefore they are protected by litigation privilege. The affidavits filed in ex parte applications disclosed only conclusions or effects of those communications and did not deploy the contents so as to waive privilege. Accordingly the discovery/inspection summons is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dated 24 September 2021 dismissed
- Costs to follow the event: costs to the Plaintiffs to be summarily assessed and paid by the 2nd Defendant forthwith, certificate for Senior Counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment