ESPIRITU MARCELINO N AND ANOTHER v. LO KIT
The defendant, as owner, was liable in negligence for the collapse of the unauthorised, corroded balcony (a metal cage) because it was poorly constructed, exposed to damp and not maintained or supported; the defendant's late concession of liability following acceptance of the Building Department's report settled factual causation and liability and there was no pursued contributory negligence; damages were assessed on the evidence and plaintiff vulnerability and economic loss quantified by lump sums.
- Citation
- ESPIRITU MARCELINO N AND ANOTHER v. LO KIT
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: ESPIRITU MARCELINO N; 2nd Plaintiff: TAN, ANNABEL M; Defendant: LO KIT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2000
- Case Number
- HCPI1266/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs on liability and quantum
- Legal Topics
- Liability for Collapse of Structures, Assessment of Damages, Causation, Illegal/unauthorised Structures, Possession Proceedings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ESPIRITU MARCELINO N
1st Plaintiff
TAN, ANNABEL M
2nd Plaintiff
LO KIT
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain an unauthorised balcony structure causing its collapse and plaintiffs injuries
- 2 Whether plaintiffs conduct contributed to the collapse (contributory negligence)
- 3 Proper assessment and components of damages for physical injury and nervous shock
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant, as owner, was liable in negligence for the collapse of the unauthorised, corroded balcony (a metal cage) because it was poorly constructed, exposed to damp and not maintained or supported; the defendant's late concession of liability following acceptance of the Building Department's report settled factual causation and liability and there was no pursued contributory negligence; damages were assessed on the evidence and plaintiff vulnerability and economic loss quantified by lump sums.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs on liability and quantum
Orders
- Judgment for 1st Plaintiff in the sum of HKD 436000 with interest for the relevant periods
- Judgment for 2nd Plaintiff in the sum of HKD 86000 with interest for the relevant periods
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment