LO MAN YAU v. CHIU SUNG FAI AND ANOTHER
Defendant proved he contributed money towards acquisition (found to be $461,560 as qualifying contribution) and therefore a resulting trust arose giving him a 30.77% beneficial interest; purchaser failed to inspect or make proper inquiries and was fixed with constructive notice, so purchaser's registered title is subject to that beneficial interest; plaintiff's claim for possession and mesne profits dismissed and declaration granted for 30.77% beneficial ownership; costs awarded to 1st defendant.
- Citation
- LO MAN YAU v. CHIU SUNG FAI AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lo Man Yau; 1st Defendant: Chiu Sung Fai; 2nd Defendant: All occupiers of Flat B7 and B8 on 3rd Floor Tung Lee Building Nos 1C-1K Water Street Nos 1-15 On Ling Lane Hong Kong
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2017
- Case Number
- DCCJ2516/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Possession and Proprietary Claim / Judgment Following Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for possession and mesne profits dismissed; declaration that 1st defendant is beneficial owner of 30.77% under a resulting trust; costs to 1st defendant
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Constructive Notice/overriding Interest, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice, Life Interest, Possession and Mesne Profits, Registration of Instruments
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lo Man Yau
Plaintiff
Chiu Sung Fai
1st Defendant
All occupiers of Flat B7 and B8 on 3rd Floor Tung Lee Building Nos 1C-1K Water Street Nos 1-15 On Ling Lane Hong Kong
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Possession and Proprietary Claim / Judgment Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant contributed to purchase price and thus has beneficial interest (resulting trust)
- 2 Whether South Sea/Daniel Ng held property on resulting or constructive trust for defendant
- 3 Whether purchaser's title is subject to defendant's beneficial interest
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant proved he contributed money towards acquisition (found to be $461,560 as qualifying contribution) and therefore a resulting trust arose giving him a 30.77% beneficial interest; purchaser failed to inspect or make proper inquiries and was fixed with constructive notice, so purchaser's registered title is subject to that beneficial interest; plaintiff's claim for possession and mesne profits dismissed and declaration granted for 30.77% beneficial ownership; costs awarded to 1st defendant.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for possession and mesne profits dismissed; declaration that 1st defendant is beneficial owner of 30.77% under a resulting trust; costs to 1st defendant
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Declaration that 1st defendant is beneficial owner to extent of 30.77% under a resulting trust
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment