MA KIM SING v. URBAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
Edit the orthopaedic report to remove the non-psychiatric expert's psychiatric comments because the plaintiff relied on a psychiatrist and the parties agreed; allow oral evidence from the orthopaedic experts limited to the specific contested issue of the length of sick leave (given conflicting opinions and Court of Appeal authority), but refuse leave to call them on resumption of pre-accident work because the written reports were sufficiently clear on that point (subject to trial judge's discretion).
- Citation
- MA KIM SING v. URBAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ma Kim Sing; 1st Defendant: Urban Property Management Limited; 2nd Defendant: Wai Hong Cleaning & Pest Control Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2008
- Case Number
- HCPI270/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Pre Trial Review (in Chambers)
- Outcome
- Pre-trial review order granting editing of psychiatric comments from plaintiff's orthopaedic report; granting leave to call orthopaedic experts limited to the issue of length of sick leave; refusing leave to call orthopaedic experts on resumption of pre-accident work (subject to trial judge discretion); reserving 4...
- Legal Topics
- Editing of Expert Reports, Admissibility of Non Expert Psychiatric Comment, Calling Experts on Specific Issues, Sick Leave Period, Resumption of Pre Accident Work, Trial Management
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ma Kim Sing
Plaintiff
Urban Property Management Limited
1st Defendant
Wai Hong Cleaning & Pest Control Company Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Pre Trial Review (in Chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-psychiatric expert's psychiatric observations should be edited out of the report
- 2 Whether orthopaedic experts should be permitted to give oral evidence on length of sick leave
- 3 Whether orthopaedic experts should be permitted to give oral evidence on ability to resume pre-accident work
Ratio Decidendi
Edit the orthopaedic report to remove the non-psychiatric expert's psychiatric comments because the plaintiff relied on a psychiatrist and the parties agreed; allow oral evidence from the orthopaedic experts limited to the specific contested issue of the length of sick leave (given conflicting opinions and Court of Appeal authority), but refuse leave to call them on resumption of pre-accident work because the written reports were sufficiently clear on that point (subject to trial judge's discretion).
Court Disposition
Pre-trial review order granting editing of psychiatric comments from plaintiff's orthopaedic report; granting leave to call orthopaedic experts limited to the issue of length of sick leave; refusing leave to call orthopaedic experts on resumption of pre-accident work (subject to trial judge discretion); reserving 4...
Orders
- Delete psychiatric-condition references from Dr Ko's orthopaedic report as agreed by parties
- Leave granted for Dr Ko and Dr Cheng to be called at trial only on the issue of the length of sick leave
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment