RE MAN CHIU CHOI

RE MAN CHIU CHOI

The court granted the vesting order because the applicant established beneficial entitlement to the Lots and demonstrated that no personal representative had been appointed such that the legal estate remained unvested, enabling the court to exercise its section 45 Trustee Ordinance jurisdiction to vest legal title...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 1745
Parties
Applicant: Man Chiu Choi; Respondent (registered Trustee): Man Kau-yiu; Interested Party/beneficiary: Man Ping-kwong
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 July 2019
Case Number
HCMP311/2019
Procedural Posture
HCMP 311/2019 (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Application for Vesting Order Under Section 45 Trustee Ordinance
Outcome
Application granted; vesting order made under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance
Legal Topics
Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance, Grant of Letters of Administration, Succession to Property, Trusteeship and Registration
Source Language
en
Trusts Probate Land Law Succession Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance Grant of Letters of Administration Succession to Property Trusteeship and Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Man Chiu Choi

Applicant

Man Kau-yiu

Respondent (registered Trustee)

Man Ping-kwong

Interested Party/beneficiary

Procedural Posture

HCMP 311/2019 (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Application for Vesting Order Under Section 45 Trustee Ordinance

  1. 1 Whether the court should exercise its jurisdiction under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance to vest the legal estate in the applicant
  2. 2 Whether Letters of Administration or a personal representative had been validly appointed for the deceased owners so that a vesting order is inappropriate
  3. 3 Whether the applicant established beneficial entitlement to the Lots and the absence of any competing equitable claim

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted the vesting order because the applicant established beneficial entitlement to the Lots and demonstrated that no personal representative had been appointed such that the legal estate remained unvested, enabling the court to exercise its section 45 Trustee Ordinance jurisdiction to vest legal title in the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application granted; vesting order made under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance

Orders

  • Vesting order under section 45 Trustee Ordinance that the legal estate in San Tin Lot Nos. 508, 568, 1585, 776 and 883 be vested in the applicant Man Chiu Choi
  • Costs to be taxed if not agreed