AVION INVESTMENT LTD v. MAN YUN KWAN AND OTHERS
Insufficient evidence supported finding of a legal assignment in 1984; on the facts the 1984 transaction amounted to a surrender by operation of law and the creation of a new tenancy governed by Part IV of Cap.7; therefore sub-tenants became direct tenants under s.119P(8) and could not be summarily evicted without proper notices and Tribunal proceedings, preventing the Tribunal from fixing the mandatory commencement/completion dates required by ss.53A(2)(b)/119F(2)(b); accordingly the landlord failed to satisfy the mandatory conditions for redevelopment possession orders and the consolidated possession applications were dismissed.
- Citation
- AVION INVESTMENT LTD v. MAN YUN KWAN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant / Landlord: Avion Investment Limited; Respondent: Man Yun Kwan; Respondents: Various other respondents including sub-tenants and Mr Lee Tung Chau
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 September 1994
- Case Number
- LDMP1884/1993
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Application for Possession and Redevelopment / Lands Tribunal Hearing and Decision (consolidated Applications Dismissed)
- Outcome
- All consolidated applications for orders of possession dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redevelopment and Possession Orders, Assignment Versus Surrender of Tenancy, Status and Protection of Sub Tenants Under Part II and Part IV of Cap.7, Estoppel, Compensation for Displacement, Tribunal Discretion on Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avion Investment Limited
Applicant / Landlord
Man Yun Kwan
Respondent
Various other respondents including sub-tenants and Mr Lee Tung Chau
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Application for Possession and Redevelopment / Lands Tribunal Hearing and Decision (consolidated Applications Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord proved intention and financial ability to rebuild
- 2 Whether informal 1984 oral transfer amounted to a legal assignment or amounted to surrender by operation of law
- 3 Whether Mr Lee's tenancy is governed by Part II or Part IV of Cap.7
Ratio Decidendi
Insufficient evidence supported finding of a legal assignment in 1984; on the facts the 1984 transaction amounted to a surrender by operation of law and the creation of a new tenancy governed by Part IV of Cap.7; therefore sub-tenants became direct tenants under s.119P(8) and could not be summarily evicted without proper notices and Tribunal proceedings, preventing the Tribunal from fixing the mandatory commencement/completion dates required by ss.53A(2)(b)/119F(2)(b); accordingly the landlord failed to satisfy the mandatory conditions for redevelopment possession orders and the consolidated possession applications were dismissed.
Court Disposition
All consolidated applications for orders of possession dismissed
Orders
- Consolidated Lands Tribunal Applications for possession dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment