KAUR PARAMJIT v. LI ON NA t/a 新長發快餐 AND OTHERS
The court found the applicant had a reasonable excuse (genuine ignorance of the change of ownership), the claim against the proposed 3rd respondent had merit, there was no demonstrated prejudice to the 3rd respondent from the delay, and the proceedings were instituted within the statutory limitation period; accordingly the court granted leave to join the 3rd respondent out of time.
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 1388
- Parties
- Applicant: Mdm Kaur; 1st Respondent: Mdm Li (trading as San Cheung Fast Food); 2nd Respondent: Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board; 3rd Respondent: He Xiao Ying (trading as San Cheung Fast Food)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2018
- Case Number
- DCEC1479/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation Proceedings Under the Employees Compensation Ordinance / Application for Leave to Join a New Party Out of Time Following Set Aside of Default Judgments
- Outcome
- Joinder application granted; leave granted to join He Xiao Ying trading as San Cheung Fast Food as the 3rd respondent out of time; costs directions made
- Legal Topics
- Joinder, Extension of Time, Limitation Period, Default Judgment, Set Aside, Reasonable Excuse, Prejudice, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mdm Kaur
Applicant
Mdm Li (trading as San Cheung Fast Food)
1st Respondent
Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board
2nd Respondent
He Xiao Ying (trading as San Cheung Fast Food)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation Proceedings Under the Employees Compensation Ordinance / Application for Leave to Join a New Party Out of Time Following Set Aside of Default Judgments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant leave to join a new defendant out of time
- 2 Whether the applicant had a reasonable excuse for the delay in seeking joinder
- 3 Whether the proposed joinder would cause prejudice to the intended respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the applicant had a reasonable excuse (genuine ignorance of the change of ownership), the claim against the proposed 3rd respondent had merit, there was no demonstrated prejudice to the 3rd respondent from the delay, and the proceedings were instituted within the statutory limitation period; accordingly the court granted leave to join the 3rd respondent out of time.
Court Disposition
Joinder application granted; leave granted to join He Xiao Ying trading as San Cheung Fast Food as the 3rd respondent out of time; costs directions made
Orders
- Leave granted to Mdm Kaur to join He Xiao Ying trading as San Cheung Fast Food as 3rd respondent out of time
- No order as to costs in respect of Mdm Li (1st respondent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment