MEI YU LAU v. SHIU LI LAU and Others

MEI YU LAU v. SHIU LI LAU and Others

The appeal was allowed and final judgment entered on the basis that the New Jersey in personam judgment was binding as between plaintiff and first defendant; alleged substantive errors or merits disputes and the involvement of other defendants do not constitute 'some other reason' under Order 14 or grounds to refuse enforcement absent a demonstrated breach of natural justice that renders the foreign proceeding non‑judicial.

Citation
MEI YU LAU v. SHIU LI LAU and Others
Parties
Plaintiff: MEI YU LAU; First Defendant: SHIU KI LAU; Second Defendant: INTERTEX TRADING COMPANY LIMITED; Third Defendant: SOU FUN TANG; Fourth Defendant: SHIU TICK LAU
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
13 September 1995
Case Number
HCA1063/1995
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment (order 14) / Appeal Heard in Chambers; Reasons for Judgment Handed Down
Outcome
Appeal allowed; final judgment entered against first defendant
Legal Topics
Order 14 Summary Judgment, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgment, Natural Justice, In Personam Foreign Judgments
Source Language
EN
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Civil Procedure Private International Law Family/matrimonial Property Order 14 Summary Judgment Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgment Natural Justice In Personam Foreign Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MEI YU LAU

Plaintiff

SHIU KI LAU

First Defendant

INTERTEX TRADING COMPANY LIMITED

Second Defendant

SOU FUN TANG

Third Defendant

SHIU TICK LAU

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment (order 14) / Appeal Heard in Chambers; Reasons for Judgment Handed Down

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 should be refused because of 'some other reason' (involvement of other defendants)
  2. 2 Whether a final foreign judgment of the New Jersey court can be impeached in Hong Kong on grounds that it is 'palpably wrong' or 'fatally flawed'
  3. 3 Whether alleged breaches of natural justice or substantive errors in foreign judgment justify refusal of enforcement

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed and final judgment entered on the basis that the New Jersey in personam judgment was binding as between plaintiff and first defendant; alleged substantive errors or merits disputes and the involvement of other defendants do not constitute 'some other reason' under Order 14 or grounds to refuse enforcement absent a demonstrated breach of natural justice that renders the foreign proceeding non‑judicial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; final judgment entered against first defendant

Orders

  • Final judgment entered against first defendant SHIU KI LAU for US$4,168,771.15
  • Costs awarded to plaintiff of the appeal and the Order 14 application before the Master