CAMPBELL NELSON MCSKIMMING v. SPRIDE LTD AND OTHERS
Service on each defendant was proven under Companies Ordinance s.827 and no acknowledgements or defenses were filed; the pleaded facts — recent shell companies with low paid up capital, common Mainland director addresses, transfers received within close temporal proximity under the same pretext — were therefore deemed admitted and sufficed to establish on the pleadings a conspiracy to defraud; accordingly default judgment was entered against each defendant individually and jointly and severally, declaratory and proprietary relief was granted and costs were awarded.
- Citation
- [2019] HKDC 1301
- Parties
- Plaintiff: MICHAEL JOHN UREN; Plaintiff: CAMPBELL NELSON MCSKIMMING; Defendant: GCHAIN LIMITED; Defendant: HORUDA TRADE LIMITED; Defendant: WANTOP TRADE HK LIMITED; Defendant: HK ANSHAN TRADE LIMITED; Defendant: PSA TRADE LIMITED; Defendant: HK WENXIANQI TRADE CO, LIMITED; Defendant: HK FUQI TRADE LIMITED; Defendant: SPRIDE LIMITED; Defendant: GRATC TRADE LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2019
- Case Number
- DCCJ1988/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Fraud Claim; Default Judgment Applications Under District Court Rules / Application Under Order 19 Rule 7 for Default Judgment; Judgment Entered on Summons
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted in favour of each plaintiff against the named defendants; judgment entered individually and jointly and severally; declaratory and proprietary relief granted to secure plaintiffs' proprietary claims; costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Service of Process, Conspiracy to Defraud, Constructive Trust, Proprietary Remedies, Joint and Several Liability, Pleadings Deemed Admitted
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MICHAEL JOHN UREN
Plaintiff
CAMPBELL NELSON MCSKIMMING
Plaintiff
GCHAIN LIMITED
Defendant
HORUDA TRADE LIMITED
Defendant
WANTOP TRADE HK LIMITED
Defendant
HK ANSHAN TRADE LIMITED
Defendant
PSA TRADE LIMITED
Defendant
HK WENXIANQI TRADE CO, LIMITED
Defendant
HK FUQI TRADE LIMITED
Defendant
SPRIDE LIMITED
Defendant
GRATC TRADE LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Fraud Claim; Default Judgment Applications Under District Court Rules / Application Under Order 19 Rule 7 for Default Judgment; Judgment Entered on Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service on defendants was proper and effective
- 2 Whether plaintiffs established ownership/proprietary claims sufficient for declaratory relief
- 3 Whether the tort of conspiracy to defraud was made out on the pleadings
Ratio Decidendi
Service on each defendant was proven under Companies Ordinance s.827 and no acknowledgements or defenses were filed; the pleaded facts — recent shell companies with low paid up capital, common Mainland director addresses, transfers received within close temporal proximity under the same pretext — were therefore deemed admitted and sufficed to establish on the pleadings a conspiracy to defraud; accordingly default judgment was entered against each defendant individually and jointly and severally, declaratory and proprietary relief was granted and costs were awarded.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted in favour of each plaintiff against the named defendants; judgment entered individually and jointly and severally; declaratory and proprietary relief granted to secure plaintiffs' proprietary claims; costs awarded.
Orders
- Judgment entered against each defendant in the sums stated in the draft orders prepared by the plaintiffs' solicitors as amended in court
- Declaratory relief and proprietary remedies granted to secure the plaintiffs' proprietary claims (including constructive trust as pleaded)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment