ULTIMATE PC AND MAC GALLERY LTD v. WU KA YAN DOROTHY AND OTHERS
The court rejected the defendants' account that Lung gifted three watches and found the transfer of $662,800 unjustified; on the balance of probabilities D1, D2 and D3 conspired (unlawful means conspiracy) to appropriate P's funds and were jointly and severally liable for net damages of $157,800; the payments alleged as loans were instead repayments related to that misappropriation; D2 was liable for the Japan trip subsidy; D1 and D3's wrongful dismissal claim failed because dismissal was properly justified; P is entitled to costs but subject to a reduction due to late disclosure which warranted an adverse costs order nisi.
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 915
- Parties
- Plaintiff (dccj 1320/2015); Defendant (dccj 2681/2015): Ultimate PC and Mac Gallery Limited; 1st Defendant (dccj 1320/2015); 1st Plaintiff (dccj 2681/2015): Wu Ka Yan Dorothy; 2nd Defendant (dccj 1320/2015): Ng King Fai; 3rd Defendant (dccj 1320/2015); 2nd Plaintiff (dccj 2681/2015): Cheng Siu Choi
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2018
- Case Number
- DCCJ1320/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (misappropriation; Employment Disputes Consolidated) / Judgment After Trial (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff in DCCJ 1320/2015 succeeded in part; defendants D1-D3 found liable; counterclaims dismissed; DCCJ 2681/2015 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Misappropriation, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, Wrongful Dismissal, Long Service Payment, Payment in Lieu of Notice, Discovery (late Disclosure), Damages, Costs Order
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ultimate PC and Mac Gallery Limited
Plaintiff (dccj 1320/2015); Defendant (dccj 2681/2015)
Wu Ka Yan Dorothy
1st Defendant (dccj 1320/2015); 1st Plaintiff (dccj 2681/2015)
Ng King Fai
2nd Defendant (dccj 1320/2015)
Cheng Siu Choi
3rd Defendant (dccj 1320/2015); 2nd Plaintiff (dccj 2681/2015)
Procedural Posture
Civil (misappropriation; Employment Disputes Consolidated) / Judgment After Trial (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the $662,800 transfer constituted misappropriation or an authorised reimbursement for watches
- 2 Whether D1-D3 were legitimate recipients of gifts or co-conspirators
- 3 Whether payments of $320,000 and $185,000 were loans or repayments related to the watches
Ratio Decidendi
The court rejected the defendants' account that Lung gifted three watches and found the transfer of $662,800 unjustified; on the balance of probabilities D1, D2 and D3 conspired (unlawful means conspiracy) to appropriate P's funds and were jointly and severally liable for net damages of $157,800; the payments alleged as loans were instead repayments related to that misappropriation; D2 was liable for the Japan trip subsidy; D1 and D3's wrongful dismissal claim failed because dismissal was properly justified; P is entitled to costs but subject to a reduction due to late disclosure which warranted an adverse costs order nisi.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff in DCCJ 1320/2015 succeeded in part; defendants D1-D3 found liable; counterclaims dismissed; DCCJ 2681/2015 dismissed.
Orders
- D1 to D3 jointly and severally liable to pay plaintiff HKD 157800 in damages
- Counterclaim of D1 and D2 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment