CHOY BING WING v. OFFICIAL RECEIVER

CHOY BING WING v. OFFICIAL RECEIVER

Application dismissed because applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds under s84: there was no cogent evidence that Alljean (or Lintax) repaid the bank such that the Official Receiver misapplied or failed to recover funds; allegations unsupported by documentary proof and other remedies and delay applicable,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CHOY BING WING v. OFFICIAL RECEIVER
Parties
Applicant (creditor): Choy Bing Wing; Respondent (trustee): Official Receiver and Trustee of the Bankrupt Ng Yat Chi (Discharged); Bankrupt (discharged): Ng Yat Chi
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
15 February 2001
Case Number
HCB242/1992
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application Under Section 84 (in Chambers) — Hearing 8 Feb 2001; Decision 15 Feb 2001
Outcome
Notice of Motion dismissed; no enquiry ordered under section 84 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance.
Legal Topics
Misfeasance, Inquiry Into Trustee Conduct, Disclosure of Documents, Sale of Company Shares, Charges/security, Creditor Remedies
Source Language
en
Bankruptcy Trusteeship Fiduciary Duties Property Law Civil Procedure Insolvency Misfeasance Inquiry Into Trustee Conduct +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Choy Bing Wing

Applicant (creditor)

Official Receiver and Trustee of the Bankrupt Ng Yat Chi (Discharged)

Respondent (trustee)

Ng Yat Chi

Bankrupt (discharged)

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Application Under Section 84 (in Chambers) — Hearing 8 Feb 2001; Decision 15 Feb 2001

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should order an inquiry under section 84 into the Official Receiver's conduct in the sale of Alljean shares
  2. 2 Whether Alljean (or Lintax) repaid the bank debt of $33.11m such that the estate was wrongly deprived
  3. 3 Whether there is cogent evidence of misfeasance or breach of fiduciary duty by the Official Receiver

Ratio Decidendi

Application dismissed because applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds under s84: there was no cogent evidence that Alljean (or Lintax) repaid the bank such that the Official Receiver misapplied or failed to recover funds; allegations unsupported by documentary proof and other remedies and delay applicable, so no inquiry ordered.

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion dismissed; no enquiry ordered under section 84 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance.

Orders

  • Dismissal of the application
  • Costs ordered nisi to follow the event; Applicant to bear the costs of the Official Receiver