毛雲傑 對 漁農自然護理署
Because the appellant's appeal had been dismissed and he did not respond to the respondent's costs statement, and because the court found the respondent's claimed items, time and rates reasonable on summary assessment, the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal assessed at HK$20,250.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCA 919
- Parties
- Applicant: Mo Wan Kit; Respondent: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2023
- Case Number
- CACV452/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent's costs of the appeal assessed summarily at HK$20,250.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Appeal, Summary Assessment, Unrepresented Litigant
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mo Wan Kit
Applicant
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is liable for the respondent's costs of the appeal
- 2 Whether the respondent's claimed items, hours and rates are reasonable for summary assessment
- 3 Whether absence of a response from the appellant affects the assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellant's appeal had been dismissed and he did not respond to the respondent's costs statement, and because the court found the respondent's claimed items, time and rates reasonable on summary assessment, the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal assessed at HK$20,250.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent's costs of the appeal assessed summarily at HK$20,250.
Orders
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal assessed summarily at HK$20,250.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACV 452/2022, [2023] HKCA 919 原本案件 [2022] HKDC 1125 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 民事司法管轄權 民事上訴 民事上訴案件2022年第452號 (原本案件: 區域法院僱員補償案件2014年第1844號) 申請人 毛雲傑 (Mo Wan Kit) 對 答辯人 漁農自然護理署(AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT) 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長關淑馨 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長朱芬齡 高等法院上訴法庭法官區慶祥 判決書日期: 2023年8月3日 判決書(訟費評估) 由上訴法庭副庭長朱芬齡頒發上訴法庭判決書: 本庭在2023年6月20日頒發判案書,駁回申請人的上訴,及命令申請人支付答辯人上訴的訟費,金額以簡易程序評估。 根據本庭的指示,答辯人在2023年6月27日提交了訟費陳述書。申請人至今未有14天內提交回應書,本庭視他為不擬就答辯人的訟費陳述書作出回應。 本庭經考慮答辯人的訟費陳述書,認為按照訴訟各方對評基準,答辯人收取的項目、時數及收費合理,因此將答辯人上訴的訟費評定為港幣20,250元。 (關淑馨) 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長 (朱芬齡) 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長 (區慶祥) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 申請人: 無律師代表 答辯人: 由律政司政府律師王家琪代表