CHEUNG WING KWAN,TOMMY v. 香港出口信用保險局AND OTHERS
The plaintiff was bankrupt and the estate vested in the official receiver under s58 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance; the plaintiff lacked the official receiver's consent required by s30A to pursue pre-bankruptcy claims; he failed to obtain consent despite an adjournment; therefore he lacked authority to bring the action, the claim was properly struck out, the application for leave to appeal had no prospects and was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the defendants with a gross sum of HK$18,000 assessed payable forthwith.
- Citation
- CHEUNG WING KWAN,TOMMY v. 香港出口信用保險局AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mr Cheung; Defendant: Defendants
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2011
- Case Number
- DCCJ923/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal (civil) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Striking Out Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out, Official Receiver Consent, Vesting of Estate, Leave to Appeal, Assessment of Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Cheung
Plaintiff
Defendants
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal (civil) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Striking Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff required the consent of the official receiver to pursue claims arising before the bankruptcy order
- 2 Whether the plaintiff had prospects of success on appeal from the striking out order
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded and gross sum assessed
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was bankrupt and the estate vested in the official receiver under s58 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance; the plaintiff lacked the official receiver's consent required by s30A to pursue pre-bankruptcy claims; he failed to obtain consent despite an adjournment; therefore he lacked authority to bring the action, the claim was properly struck out, the application for leave to appeal had no prospects and was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the defendants with a gross sum of HK$18,000 assessed payable forthwith.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Costs of the application to be borne by the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment