TAM SHAIR LEUNG v. TAM CHEUNG SHIU

TAM SHAIR LEUNG v. TAM CHEUNG SHIU

The court found a collateral agreement comprising the 1 April 1999 agreement, the 7 June 1999 supplemental agreement, the minutes and oral conditions; the Plaintiff breached essential conditions (failure to hand over accounts and continued harassment), entitling the Defendant to repudiate and recover the HK$45,000...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TAM SHAIR LEUNG v. TAM CHEUNG SHIU
Parties
Plaintiff: Mr. Szeto Park Patrick
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 May 2004
Case Number
DCCJ3079/2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract Claim and Counterclaim / Judgment
Outcome
Defendant's counterclaim allowed; Plaintiff's claim dismissed; Defendant entitled to repayment of $45,000 plus interest and costs
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Consideration, Repudiation, Duress, Total Failure of Consideration, Variation of Agreement, Enforceability
Source Language
en
Contract Law Civil Litigation Restitution Breach of Contract Consideration Repudiation Duress Total Failure of Consideration +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Szeto Park Patrick

Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Civil Contract Claim and Counterclaim / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 1 April 1999 agreement was a binding contract supported by consideration
  2. 2 Whether the 7 June 1999 variation and associated oral conditions formed part of the collateral agreement
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff breached conditions (handover of accounts and cessation of harassment) permitting repudiation

Ratio Decidendi

The court found a collateral agreement comprising the 1 April 1999 agreement, the 7 June 1999 supplemental agreement, the minutes and oral conditions; the Plaintiff breached essential conditions (failure to hand over accounts and continued harassment), entitling the Defendant to repudiate and recover the HK$45,000 paid due to total failure of consideration; issues of duress need not be decided.

Court Disposition

Defendant's counterclaim allowed; Plaintiff's claim dismissed; Defendant entitled to repayment of $45,000 plus interest and costs

Orders

  • Defendant entitled to recover $45,000 from the Plaintiff
  • Interest on $45,000 awarded from date of service of counterclaim to date of judgment at judgment rate and thereafter at judgment rate until full payment