MAHMOOD ANSAR v. RISING AERIAL PLATFORM CO LTD AND OTHERS
Judge accepted the jointly appointed expert Dr Wong's Single Joint Medical Reports and allowed the applicants' appeals against the Form 7 percentages, assessing each applicant's permanent loss of earning capacity at 5%; applied those percentages to calculate statutory compensation under sections 9 and 10 of the ECO, left sick leave periods undisturbed, awarded specified sums to each applicant with interest, and held that the 2nd respondent is entitled to indemnity by the 1st respondent under section 24(2) including costs.
- Citation
- [2021] HKDC 387
- Parties
- Applicant: Naseem-Abbas; Applicant: Mahmood Ansar; 1st Respondent: Rising Aerial Platform Company Limited; 2nd Respondent: Sunrise Construction Engineering Limited; 3rd Respondent: Falcon Insurance Company (Hong Kong) Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2021
- Case Number
- DCEC1900/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employees' Compensation / Assessment of Compensation Following Interlocutory Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Interlocutory liability previously entered against 1st and 2nd respondents upheld for payment of compensation; applicants' appeals allowed on quantum; 2nd respondent entitled to indemnity by 1st respondent under s24(2) ECO; costs to follow the event subject to nisi order.
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Earning Capacity, Sick Leave Compensation, Indemnity Under Section 24(2) ECO, Statutory Assessment (form 7), Appeal Against Certificate of Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naseem-Abbas
Applicant
Mahmood Ansar
Applicant
Rising Aerial Platform Company Limited
1st Respondent
Sunrise Construction Engineering Limited
2nd Respondent
Falcon Insurance Company (Hong Kong) Limited
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees' Compensation / Assessment of Compensation Following Interlocutory Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to adopt the Single Joint Medical Report expert assessment (5%) or the Form 7 assessments (1% and 2%) for loss of earning capacity
- 2 Calculation of compensation under sections 9 and 10 of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance
- 3 Whether the principal contractor (2nd respondent) is entitled to indemnity by the subcontractor (1st respondent) under section 24(2) ECO
Ratio Decidendi
Judge accepted the jointly appointed expert Dr Wong's Single Joint Medical Reports and allowed the applicants' appeals against the Form 7 percentages, assessing each applicant's permanent loss of earning capacity at 5%; applied those percentages to calculate statutory compensation under sections 9 and 10 of the ECO, left sick leave periods undisturbed, awarded specified sums to each applicant with interest, and held that the 2nd respondent is entitled to indemnity by the 1st respondent under section 24(2) including costs.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory liability previously entered against 1st and 2nd respondents upheld for payment of compensation; applicants' appeals allowed on quantum; 2nd respondent entitled to indemnity by 1st respondent under s24(2) ECO; costs to follow the event subject to nisi order.
Orders
- 1st respondent liable to pay compensation in respect of the injuries of the 1st and 2nd applicants under section 5 of the ECO
- 2nd respondent liable to pay compensation in respect of the injuries of the 1st and 2nd applicants under section 24 of the ECO
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment