NATALIE W CHEN v. WONG SIU LING AND ANOTHER
The court held that, on the evidence including the memorandum of wishes and the parties' conduct, the 1985 settlement operated as a fixed settlement in accordance with the settlor's will (not a true discretionary trust); although the trustees breached fiduciary duties by allowing conflicts in relation to the Barker Road redevelopment and by lacking openness over estate matters, there was no dishonesty or continuing risk to the trust sufficient to justify removal; the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the trust property is held on the terms of the settlement as modified by the memorandum and to costs payable by the defendants personally, but no order removing the trustees or...
- Citation
- NATALIE W CHEN v. WONG SIU LING AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Natalie W Chen; 1st Defendant (trustee): Wong Siu Ling; 2nd Defendant (trustee): Wong Wan Chiu, Ignatius
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2000
- Case Number
- HCA17008/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Trust and Estate Litigation (declaration and Removal of Trustees) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Declaration granted that defendants hold trust property and income on the terms of the settlement deed as modified by the memorandum of wishes; trustees not removed; plaintiff awarded costs to be paid by the defendants personally; no damages awarded; liberty to apply.
- Legal Topics
- Discretionary Versus Fixed Trust, Memorandum of Wishes, Removal of Trustees, Conflict of Interest by Trustees, Tax Avoidance Schemes (ramsay Principle), Estate Duty Clearance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natalie W Chen
Plaintiff
Wong Siu Ling
1st Defendant (trustee)
Wong Wan Chiu, Ignatius
2nd Defendant (trustee)
Procedural Posture
Trust and Estate Litigation (declaration and Removal of Trustees) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1985 settlement was a discretionary trust or a fixed trust equivalent to the will
- 2 Whether the settlor's memorandum of wishes formed part of the trust terms and constrained trustees' discretion
- 3 Whether the trustees breached their fiduciary duties by withholding probate/estate duty clearance
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, on the evidence including the memorandum of wishes and the parties' conduct, the 1985 settlement operated as a fixed settlement in accordance with the settlor's will (not a true discretionary trust); although the trustees breached fiduciary duties by allowing conflicts in relation to the Barker Road redevelopment and by lacking openness over estate matters, there was no dishonesty or continuing risk to the trust sufficient to justify removal; the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the trust property is held on the terms of the settlement as modified by the memorandum and to costs payable by the defendants personally, but no order removing the trustees or...
Court Disposition
Declaration granted that defendants hold trust property and income on the terms of the settlement deed as modified by the memorandum of wishes; trustees not removed; plaintiff awarded costs to be paid by the defendants personally; no damages awarded; liberty to apply.
Orders
- Declaration that the defendants hold the trust property and income on the terms of the settlement deed as modified by the memorandum of wishes
- No removal of the current trustees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment