NG NIM CHUNG, deceased AND ANOTHER v. NG WING MAN TERRY
On the balance of probabilities the court found a family-wide common understanding that the defendant only lent his name to facilitate bank finance, the Late Father and Mother provided the purchase money, mortgage repayments and outgoings and detrimentally relied on that understanding; permitting the defendant to claim beneficial title would be unconscionable; accordingly a common intention constructive trust arose in favour of the Late Father and the defendant holds legal title on trust for the Late Father's estate.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5314
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (deceased): NG NIM CHUNG; 2nd Plaintiff (in Her Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of NG NIM Chung, Deceased, and in Her Personal Capacity): LEUNG WAI PING; Defendant: NG WING MAN TERRY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2025
- Case Number
- HCA2221/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (property/trust Dispute Arising From HOS Purchase) / Judgment After Re Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs (estate of the Late Father). Declarations and transfer order in favour of the 2nd Plaintiff as administratrix; costs to Plaintiffs (order nisi).
- Legal Topics
- Common Intention Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Joint Tenancy and Survivorship, Beneficial Ownership, Proprietary Estoppel, Mortgage Financing, Home Ownership Scheme (hos) Regulations, Forfeiture Form/ha Application Rules
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NG NIM CHUNG
1st Plaintiff (deceased)
LEUNG WAI PING
2nd Plaintiff (in Her Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of NG NIM Chung, Deceased, and in Her Personal Capacity)
NG WING MAN TERRY
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (property/trust Dispute Arising From HOS Purchase) / Judgment After Re Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant had any beneficial interest in the property or merely held legal title as a nominee
- 2 Whether a common intention constructive trust arose in favour of the deceased (Late Father)
- 3 Whether the defendant’s alleged financial contributions (down payment and monthly payments) were made and sufficed to rebut the presumption that equity follows the law
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found a family-wide common understanding that the defendant only lent his name to facilitate bank finance, the Late Father and Mother provided the purchase money, mortgage repayments and outgoings and detrimentally relied on that understanding; permitting the defendant to claim beneficial title would be unconscionable; accordingly a common intention constructive trust arose in favour of the Late Father and the defendant holds legal title on trust for the Late Father's estate.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs (estate of the Late Father). Declarations and transfer order in favour of the 2nd Plaintiff as administratrix; costs to Plaintiffs (order nisi).
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the Late Father’s estate (2nd Plaintiff)
- Declaration that the Late Father was, and his estate is, solely entitled to the beneficial ownership, title and interest in the Property and that the Defendant was not so entitled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment