香港特別行政區 訴 牛永鑫
Leave to appeal against sentence was granted because the applicant raised reasonably arguable errors in the construction of the sentencing benchmark for different drugs and in the decision to order full concurrency, matters which require appellate determination.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 1052
- Parties
- Respondent: 香港特別行政區; Applicant: NGAU Wing sun (牛永鑫)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2019
- Case Number
- CACC34/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (sentence) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Leave Granted
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Trafficking, Sentencing Guidelines, Concurrent Sentences, Totality Principle, Absurdity Test, Conversion Test
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
香港特別行政區
Respondent
NGAU Wing sun (牛永鑫)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (sentence) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Leave Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in calculating the sentencing benchmark by simply adding tariffs for two different drugs (cocaine and ketamine), thereby failing the absurdity and conversion tests
- 2 Whether ordering full concurrency of sentences was erroneous and breached the principle that multiple sentences should not be excessive (totality principle)
- 3 Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal against sentence was granted because the applicant raised reasonably arguable errors in the construction of the sentencing benchmark for different drugs and in the decision to order full concurrency, matters which require appellate determination.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; applicant permitted to appeal his sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 34/2019 [2019] HKCA 1052 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 不服刑罰上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2019年第34號 (原區域法院刑事案件2018年第207號) __________________ 答辯人 香港特別行政區 對 申請人 NGAU Wing sun (牛永鑫) __________________ 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭法官彭偉昌 聆訊日期: 2019年9月13日 判案日期: 2019年9月13日 判 案 書 申請人承認控罪(1),管有0.76克可卡因,和控罪(2),販運7.23克可卡因和0.71克氯胺酮。 就控罪(1)和(2),他被分別判囚38個月和2個月,分期執行,即合共40個月。 申請方現在投訴,原審法官在擬定控罪(1)的量刑基準時錯誤及過分簡單地把適用於兩種不同毒品的量刑基準加在一起,以致得出來的基準未能通過案例所講的absurdity test 和conversion test。 申請方也投訴,原審法官下令把控罪(1)和(2)的刑期完全分期執行,是錯誤的,而且在相關的案情下有違數罪並罰不能過重的原則。 答辯方承認,申請方的理據是合理可供辯的。他們的力陳的是,就算上訴法庭以申請方認為正確的方法重新判刑,結果都不會和現時的刑期相去太遠。 在現階段,我不認為我應該根據答辯方的想法處理本案。我認為唯一適當的做法是批准申請方的申請。 我准許申請人就他的刑期進行上訴。 (彭偉昌) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 申請人: 由法律援助署委派伍頴珊大律師代表 答辯人: 由律政司高級檢控官高凱怡女士代表