NICE BEAUTY LTD v. YAN YAN MOTORS LTD AND OTHERS
The tribunal concluded the applicant satisfied the ownership threshold (average >80% under the Specification Notice), redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and poor state of repair (extensive carbonation/corrosion, functional and physical obsolescence, repair ineffective or disproportionate), the applicant had taken reasonable steps to acquire remaining shares with offers falling within a fair and reasonable band, and accepted the experts' residual valuation giving an RDV/reserve price of HKD 812,300,000; accordingly an order for sale by public auction was made and trustees appointed.
- Citation
- [2021] HKLdT 77
- Parties
- Applicant: NICE BEAUTY LIMITED; 1st Respondent: YAN YAN MOTORS LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: SHING FUNG FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED; 3rd Respondent: CHEONG HING HING (vava); 4th Respondents: (unnamed) 4th Respondents; 5th Respondent: (unnamed) 5th Respondent
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2021
- Case Number
- LDCS14000/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment (land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance) / Final Judgment (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted under the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Threshold Under Section 3, Justification for Redevelopment Under Section 4(2), Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Existing Use Value (euv) Valuation, Redevelopment Value (rdv) and Reserve Price, Structural Condition and Repair Cost Analysis, Appointment of Trustees, Costs Order
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NICE BEAUTY LIMITED
Applicant
YAN YAN MOTORS LIMITED
1st Respondent
SHING FUNG FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Respondent
CHEONG HING HING (vava)
3rd Respondent
(unnamed) 4th Respondents
4th Respondents
(unnamed) 5th Respondent
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment (land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance) / Final Judgment (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant met the statutory ownership threshold under section 3 as varied by the Specification Notice
- 2 Whether redevelopment of the Lots is justified by the age and/or state of repair of the Building under section 4(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the applicant took reasonable steps to acquire all undivided shares on fair and reasonable terms under section 4(2)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal concluded the applicant satisfied the ownership threshold (average >80% under the Specification Notice), redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and poor state of repair (extensive carbonation/corrosion, functional and physical obsolescence, repair ineffective or disproportionate), the applicant had taken reasonable steps to acquire remaining shares with offers falling within a fair and reasonable band, and accepted the experts' residual valuation giving an RDV/reserve price of HKD 812,300,000; accordingly an order for sale by public auction was made and trustees appointed.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted under the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by public auction for redevelopment of the Lots
- Mr Norman Chui and Mr Stephen Lau nominated by the applicant appointed as trustees to discharge duties under the Ordinance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment