NOMADIC COLLECTIONS LTD AND OTHERS v. CHINA DISTRIBUTION CONTAINER LINES AND OTHERS

NOMADIC COLLECTIONS LTD AND OTHERS v. CHINA DISTRIBUTION CONTAINER LINES AND OTHERS

Because seawater damage was plainly established and the defendants failed to plead particulars or produce stowage plans or cargo reports to explain the damage or show absence of fault, they did not raise a triable issue and leave to defend was refused; summary judgment was entered for the plaintiffs for HK$99,403.91 with costs.

Citation
NOMADIC COLLECTIONS LTD AND OTHERS v. CHINA DISTRIBUTION CONTAINER LINES AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Nomadic Collections Ltd; Plaintiff: C & M Manufacturers Ltd; Plaintiff: CNA Insurance Co. Ltd; Defendant: China Distribution Container Lines Ltd; Defendant: China Distribution System Ltd; Defendant: Gage Private Ltd; Defendant: Locher Evers International Ltd
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 February 2006
Case Number
HCAJ188/2004
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Action / Application for Summary Judgment (order 14)
Outcome
Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs; leave to defend refused.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Bill of Lading, Liability for Cargo Damage, Stowage and Seawater Damage, Burden of Proof
Source Language
EN
Admiralty Carriage of Goods by Sea Contract Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Bill of Lading Liability for Cargo Damage Stowage and Seawater Damage +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nomadic Collections Ltd

Plaintiff

C & M Manufacturers Ltd

Plaintiff

CNA Insurance Co. Ltd

Plaintiff

China Distribution Container Lines Ltd

Defendant

China Distribution System Ltd

Defendant

Gage Private Ltd

Defendant

Locher Evers International Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Admiralty Action / Application for Summary Judgment (order 14)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants have raised a triable issue to resist summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether seawater damage to cargo was established and unexplained by defendants
  3. 3 Whether defendants complied with obligation to plead particulars and produce stowage plans or cargo reports

Ratio Decidendi

Because seawater damage was plainly established and the defendants failed to plead particulars or produce stowage plans or cargo reports to explain the damage or show absence of fault, they did not raise a triable issue and leave to defend was refused; summary judgment was entered for the plaintiffs for HK$99,403.91 with costs.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered for plaintiffs; leave to defend refused.

Orders

  • Judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of HK$99,403.91 as claimed
  • Costs to plaintiffs on the District Court scale, including costs of the hearing on 9 February 2006