CUCUN-FATIMAH SAINNA, a minor by her mother and next friend Cucun Fatimah v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD AND ANOTHER [Decision on Leave Application]
Leave was refused because the application was filed almost six months late with no satisfactory explanation, the intended challenge disclosed no reasonably arguable legal error, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Director's or Board's decisions, and the adverse findings as to lack of reliable evidence of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3642
- Parties
- Applicant (a Minor by Her Mother and Next Friend Cucun Fatimah): Cucun-Fatimah Sainna; 1st Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board; 2nd Putative Respondent: Director of Immigration
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2021
- Case Number
- HCAL1713/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Decision on Leave Application (leave Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Refoulement, Torture Risk (immigration Ordinance Part Viic), HKBOR Article 2 (right to Life), HKBOR Article 3 (prohibition of Torture and Inhuman Treatment), Persecution (1951 Refugee Convention Article 33), Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Delay and Extension of Time, Judicial Review Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cucun-Fatimah Sainna
Applicant (a Minor by Her Mother and Next Friend Cucun Fatimah)
Torture Claims Appeal Board
1st Putative Respondent
Director of Immigration
2nd Putative Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Decision on Leave Application (leave Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the leave application was made promptly or time should be extended
- 2 Whether there was an arguable error of law, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Director's or Board's decisions
- 3 Whether there were substantial grounds for believing the applicant faced real risk of harm on return (torture, BOR 2/3, persecution)
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was refused because the application was filed almost six months late with no satisfactory explanation, the intended challenge disclosed no reasonably arguable legal error, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Director's or Board's decisions, and the adverse findings as to lack of reliable evidence of risk, availability of state protection and internal relocation meant there was no realistic prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment