NTT DATA HONG KONG LTD v. OCTO3 LTD AND ANOTHER
Lynch was a senior and key NTT employee engaged in the performance of NTT's obligations (he signed the Upfront Payment cheque and negotiated delivery arrangements); Octo's employment of Lynch therefore breached clause 13. That breach was material in the commercial context and entitled NTT to terminate under clause 12. The 15 November 2016 notice validly terminated the Agreement. NTT is entitled to summary judgment for refund of the Upfront Payment (with interest) for failure of consideration; judgment also entered on NTT's counterclaim in HCA 44/2017. Octo's separate claim for the balance of the Licence Fee in HCA 44/2017 is struck out, but Octo's quantum meruit claim for professional...
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 325
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 3446); Defendant (hca 44): NTT Data Hong Kong Limited; 1st Defendant (hca 3446); Plaintiff (hca 44): Octo3 Limited; 2nd Defendant (hca 3446): Tyrone Shaunessy Lynch
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 February 2018
- Case Number
- HCA3446/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Dispute Concerning Software Licence, Employment Covenant and Summary Judgment Applications / Decision on Summary Judgment Application and Striking Out Application (final Decision on Interlocutory Issues)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for NTT Data Hong Kong Limited on claims in HCA 3446/2016 and on NTT's counterclaim in HCA 44/2017; partial striking out of Octo3 Limited's claim in HCA 44/2017 (balance of Licence Fee); Octo's quantum meruit claim preserved.
- Legal Topics
- Non Solicitation Clause, Termination for Breach, Summary Judgment, Construction of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Quantum Meruit, Without Prejudice Correspondence, Abuse of Process/striking Out
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NTT Data Hong Kong Limited
Plaintiff (hca 3446); Defendant (hca 44)
Octo3 Limited
1st Defendant (hca 3446); Plaintiff (hca 44)
Tyrone Shaunessy Lynch
2nd Defendant (hca 3446)
Procedural Posture
Contract Dispute Concerning Software Licence, Employment Covenant and Summary Judgment Applications / Decision on Summary Judgment Application and Striking Out Application (final Decision on Interlocutory Issues)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Octo breached clause 13 (non-solicitation) by employing Lynch
- 2 Whether Lynch was 'engaged in the performance' of NTT's obligations under the Agreement
- 3 Whether any breach was material such as to permit termination under clause 12
Ratio Decidendi
Lynch was a senior and key NTT employee engaged in the performance of NTT's obligations (he signed the Upfront Payment cheque and negotiated delivery arrangements); Octo's employment of Lynch therefore breached clause 13. That breach was material in the commercial context and entitled NTT to terminate under clause 12. The 15 November 2016 notice validly terminated the Agreement. NTT is entitled to summary judgment for refund of the Upfront Payment (with interest) for failure of consideration; judgment also entered on NTT's counterclaim in HCA 44/2017. Octo's separate claim for the balance of the Licence Fee in HCA 44/2017 is struck out, but Octo's quantum meruit claim for professional...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for NTT Data Hong Kong Limited on claims in HCA 3446/2016 and on NTT's counterclaim in HCA 44/2017; partial striking out of Octo3 Limited's claim in HCA 44/2017 (balance of Licence Fee); Octo's quantum meruit claim preserved.
Orders
- Declaration that the Agreement was validly terminated by NTT on 15 November 2016 pursuant to clause 12.1(i)
- Declaration that Octo3 Limited was in repudiatory/material breach of clause 13 of the Agreement by employing Tyrone Shaunessy Lynch
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment