CHENG CHI WING AND OTHERS v. HO SHU WAH AND ANOTHER
The court found on the evidence that the source of leakage was the defendants' guest bathroom under their exclusive control; the defendants failed to maintain the bathroom causing water to seep through gaps/cracks into the plaintiffs' premises, establishing negligence and breach of the deed of mutual covenant, entitling plaintiffs to damages and a permanent injunction; repair costs were not awarded because plaintiffs failed to prove quantum for repairs.
- Citation
- CHENG CHI WING AND OTHERS v. HO SHU WAH AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Cheng Chi Wing; 2nd Plaintiff: Lo Yee Ha; 3rd Plaintiff (minor Sued by Lo Yee Ha as Mother and Next Friend): Cheng Yu Ching; 1st Defendant: Ho Shu Wah; 2nd Defendant: Chan Yin Fan Weddy
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2007
- Case Number
- DCCJ2370/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Tort (nuisance/negligence) for Property Damage and Personal Injury / Judgment After Trial (judgment Handed Down)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs on liability; permanent injunction granted; damages awarded in specified sum; costs ordered on indemnity basis subject to taxation.
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Negligence, Breach of Deed of Mutual Covenant, Property Damage, Personal Injury (skin Condition), Injunction, Damages, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheng Chi Wing
1st Plaintiff
Lo Yee Ha
2nd Plaintiff
Cheng Yu Ching
3rd Plaintiff (minor Sued by Lo Yee Ha as Mother and Next Friend)
Ho Shu Wah
1st Defendant
Chan Yin Fan Weddy
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Tort (nuisance/negligence) for Property Damage and Personal Injury / Judgment After Trial (judgment Handed Down)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were liable for water leakage into the plaintiffs' premises
- 2 Whether the leakage constituted actionable nuisance and/or negligence
- 3 Whether the defendants breached the deed of mutual covenant obligation to keep the flat in good repair
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the evidence that the source of leakage was the defendants' guest bathroom under their exclusive control; the defendants failed to maintain the bathroom causing water to seep through gaps/cracks into the plaintiffs' premises, establishing negligence and breach of the deed of mutual covenant, entitling plaintiffs to damages and a permanent injunction; repair costs were not awarded because plaintiffs failed to prove quantum for repairs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs on liability; permanent injunction granted; damages awarded in specified sum; costs ordered on indemnity basis subject to taxation.
Orders
- Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from causing, permitting, allowing or suffering water to be leaked, seeped or discharged from the defendants' premises into the plaintiffs' premises.
- The defendants to pay the plaintiffs HKD 46,815 within 14 days (HKD 1,815 medical expenses and HKD 45,000 for inconvenience and nuisance).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment