TAM SHUN LAU SHUI HAR v. LI WAI LUN AND ANOTHER
The strike out application was refused because absence of objective noise tests and allegations of acquiescence raise factual issues that go to the merits and are not suitable for resolution at interlocutory stage; these matters must be determined at trial.
- Citation
- TAM SHUN LAU SHUI HAR v. LI WAI LUN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: TAM SHUN; 2nd Plaintiff: LAU SHUI HAR; 1st Defendant: LI WAI LUN; 2nd Defendant: LEE MEI FUNG
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 January 2011
- Case Number
- DCCJ2394/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Private Nuisance (noise) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to strike out refused
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Noise, Strike Out, Acquiescence, Interlocutory Application
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TAM SHUN
1st Plaintiff
LAU SHUI HAR
2nd Plaintiff
LI WAI LUN
1st Defendant
LEE MEI FUNG
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Private Nuisance (noise) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim discloses a reasonable cause of action or is frivolous or vexatious
- 2 Whether a plaintiff must produce objective noise test results to maintain a nuisance claim
- 3 Whether plaintiffs' alleged long acquiescence bars the nuisance claim
Ratio Decidendi
The strike out application was refused because absence of objective noise tests and allegations of acquiescence raise factual issues that go to the merits and are not suitable for resolution at interlocutory stage; these matters must be determined at trial.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to strike out refused
Orders
- Application to strike out dismissed
- Parties to make submissions on appropriate directions for conduct of the case and on costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment