HKSAR v. O\'BRIEN MICHAEL JOHN PATRICK
The magistrate's factual findings that the appellant had no reasonable excuse for carrying the knife were entitled to deference; prior threats were sufficiently remote that they did not justify possession and there was no basis for the appellate court to disturb the conviction, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. O\'BRIEN MICHAEL JOHN PATRICK
- Parties
- Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: O'BRIEN MICHAEL JOHN PATRICK
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2000
- Case Number
- HCMA47/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Offensive Weapon, Reasonable Excuse/defence, Appellate Review of Magistrates' Findings, Identification Evidence
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HKSAR
Respondent
O'BRIEN MICHAEL JOHN PATRICK
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a lawful or reasonable excuse for possession of the knife
- 2 Whether the magistrate's factual findings were such that the appellate court should interfere
- 3 Whether missing witnesses or absence of their statements rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate's factual findings that the appellant had no reasonable excuse for carrying the knife were entitled to deference; prior threats were sufficiently remote that they did not justify possession and there was no basis for the appellate court to disturb the conviction, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Conviction for possession of an offensive weapon in a public place upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment