THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF YUE SUN MANSION v. LAKE SIDE ELDERLY CENTRE LIMITED
The Tribunal found as a fact that the dominant or primary use of the Premises, whether described as a RCHE or RCHD, is to provide residential accommodation (residential/home setting) with care ancillary; accordingly that use is domestic and not a permitted non-domestic use under the OP and falls within the prohibition in the Government Lease and Clause 10(c) of the DMC; breach of the Government Lease is illegal under the Summary Offences Ordinance and the intended use was likely to cause nuisance or annoyance to other occupiers, making a quia timet injunction necessary; the application for restoration of lift service was dismissed because no lift service to 1/F had been provided...
- Citation
- THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF YUE SUN MANSION v. LAKE SIDE ELDERLY CENTRE LIMITED
- Parties
- Applicant in LDBM 26/2015; Respondent in LDBM 32/2015: The Incorporated Owners of Yue Sun Mansion; Respondent in LDBM 26/2015; Party Associated With LDBM 32/2015: Lake Side Elderly Centre Limited; Applicant in LDBM 32/2015; Tenant of the Premises; Director and Shareholder of Lake Side: Tong
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2016
- Case Number
- LDBM26/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Building Management Applications Before Lands Tribunal Concerning Use of Premises, DMC and Lift Access / Judgment Delivered 9 December 2016
- Outcome
- Declaration and quia timet injunction granted for IO; application for restoration of lift service dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Occupation Permit (op) Compliance, Deed of Mutual Covenant (dmc) Breach, Government Lease Covenants, Use Classification Domestic Vs Non Domestic, Quia Timet Injunction, Lift/common Parts Access (bmo S34 I), Residential Care Home Licensing
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Incorporated Owners of Yue Sun Mansion
Applicant in LDBM 26/2015; Respondent in LDBM 32/2015
Lake Side Elderly Centre Limited
Respondent in LDBM 26/2015; Party Associated With LDBM 32/2015
Tong
Applicant in LDBM 32/2015; Tenant of the Premises; Director and Shareholder of Lake Side
Procedural Posture
Building Management Applications Before Lands Tribunal Concerning Use of Premises, DMC and Lift Access / Judgment Delivered 9 December 2016
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the intended use of the Premises (RCHE or RCHD)?
- 2 Whether the intended use is non-domestic
- 3 Whether the intended use breaches the Occupation Permit (OP), the Deed of Mutual Covenant (DMC) or the Government Lease
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found as a fact that the dominant or primary use of the Premises, whether described as a RCHE or RCHD, is to provide residential accommodation (residential/home setting) with care ancillary; accordingly that use is domestic and not a permitted non-domestic use under the OP and falls within the prohibition in the Government Lease and Clause 10(c) of the DMC; breach of the Government Lease is illegal under the Summary Offences Ordinance and the intended use was likely to cause nuisance or annoyance to other occupiers, making a quia timet injunction necessary; the application for restoration of lift service was dismissed because no lift service to 1/F had been provided...
Court Disposition
Declaration and quia timet injunction granted for IO; application for restoration of lift service dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that use of the Premises for the operation of either a residential care home for elderly persons (RCHE) or a residential care home for persons with disabilities (RCHD) is in breach of the Occupation Permit, the Deed of Mutual Covenant and the Government Lease
- An injunction restraining Lake Side and Tong and their agents, employees or authorized persons from operating a RCHE or RCHD or any business at the Premises for domestic purposes
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment