RE LIN HAI SAN
Section 30(10)(b)(i) must be given its plain meaning: any departure from Hong Kong by a bankrupt requires prior notification of itinerary and contact to the trustee; failure to notify suspends the running of the bankruptcy period during absence and until physical return and notification. There is no statutory or judicially required threshold of permanency (eg. three months) and immigration de minimis principles do not apply to this provision.
- Citation
- RE LIN HAI SAN
- Parties
- Bankrupt: Chan Wing Hing; Bankrupt: Lin Hai San; Applicant: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2005
- Case Number
- HCB2848/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Decision on Preliminary Point
- Outcome
- Application by the Official Receiver under s30A(3) dismissed as premature
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Discharge, Absence From Jurisdiction, Trustee Notification Duty, Interpretation of S30(10)(b)(i)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chan Wing Hing
Bankrupt
Lin Hai San
Bankrupt
Official Receiver
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Decision on Preliminary Point
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s30(10)(b)(i) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance requires a period of permanency (eg. three months) before it applies
- 2 Whether transient or frequent short departures trigger the duty to notify trustee and suspension of running of the bankruptcy period
- 3 Whether the de minimis principle from immigration cases applies to s30(10)(b)(i)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 30(10)(b)(i) must be given its plain meaning: any departure from Hong Kong by a bankrupt requires prior notification of itinerary and contact to the trustee; failure to notify suspends the running of the bankruptcy period during absence and until physical return and notification. There is no statutory or judicially required threshold of permanency (eg. three months) and immigration de minimis principles do not apply to this provision.
Court Disposition
Application by the Official Receiver under s30A(3) dismissed as premature
Orders
- Application dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment